accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Wall <mjw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Java 8
Date Thu, 18 Aug 2016 21:57:52 GMT
I am good with requiring Java 8 and moving to 2.0 for the release.  Doesn't
look like the vote for 1.8.0 is going to pass, which is good.  That gives
us a little more time to discuss this.  We will have to redo all the
testing, which is fine too.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:

> That's fine with me. I think people might expect a bigger jump with a major
> version change like that, but it's not a big deal. The good stuffs I was
> hoping to get into a 2.0 will just happen at 3.0 instead.
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:28 PM Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > Why don't we just make the 1.8 branch 2.0 then? I really don't want to
> > drop support for JDKs on non-major releases; it's super disruptive.
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > I know we've talked about this before, but I kind of want to just use
> > Java
> > > 8 for Accumulo 1.8. It'd help clean up some things in the build (can
> make
> > > use of newer versions of build plugins, and make it easier for new
> > > development against the latest release).
> > >
> > > I just don't know how reasonable it is to keep making new, non-bugfix
> > > releases on EOL JDKs (even though I may have previously argued that
> it'd
> > be
> > > safer to just wait until a major version bump).
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > busbey
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message