accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Java 8
Date Thu, 18 Aug 2016 21:55:23 GMT
That's fine with me. I think people might expect a bigger jump with a major
version change like that, but it's not a big deal. The good stuffs I was
hoping to get into a 2.0 will just happen at 3.0 instead.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:28 PM Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Why don't we just make the 1.8 branch 2.0 then? I really don't want to
> drop support for JDKs on non-major releases; it's super disruptive.
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:
> > I know we've talked about this before, but I kind of want to just use
> Java
> > 8 for Accumulo 1.8. It'd help clean up some things in the build (can make
> > use of newer versions of build plugins, and make it easier for new
> > development against the latest release).
> >
> > I just don't know how reasonable it is to keep making new, non-bugfix
> > releases on EOL JDKs (even though I may have previously argued that it'd
> be
> > safer to just wait until a major version bump).
>
>
>
> --
> busbey
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message