accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Plan for next release
Date Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:24:09 GMT
That was previously proposed and discussed, and the argument against it was
that it would either increase our support burden or we'd have to
prematurely EOL 1.7.

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016, 10:51 ivan bella <ivan@ivan.bella.name> wrote:

> If 1.8 and 2.0 are so close, then just release both back to back.  I am
> perfectly willing to step up and help testing if that is such a burden on
> the community.
>
> I give a -1 (non-binding) vote in this regard.
>
>
> > On August 23, 2016 at 10:21 AM "Marc P." <marc.parisi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Correct to -1 ( non-binding ). In spirit of Dave's response I'll leave it
> > that my opinion was swayed following the discussion.
> >
> > I'll also readily admit that perhaps I hadn't fully digested the
> arguments
> > previously but this thread helped cement my opinion.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Marc P. <marc.parisi@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > I think there is value in commenting because after Reading the
> responses
> > > > last night I was swayed to -1. Perhaps others might be as well.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry Marc, just for clarification are you changing your +1 vote to -1?
> > >
> > > I ask because I didn't see an email prior to this one that did that.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > busbey
> > >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message