accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 1.8.0 RC3
Date Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:56:53 GMT
Yeah, those VolumeITs are brutal to reason about. If you get stuck, 
leave a note on JIRA. I can try to find some time this weekend to dig in.

Christopher wrote:
> I'm currently bisecting to figure out what's going on with ACCUMULO-4425.
> The test isn't very well documented, and there's no server-side problems,
> so I'm trying to infer from code what the test conditions the test is
> trying to evaluate actually are. We need to do a better job of commenting
> to explain what the goal of the test is.
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:47 AM Sean Busbey<busbey@cloudera.com>  wrote:
>
>> yeah, any of mine are fine for bumping. They've been a problem for a while.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> I would assume that ACCUMULO-4422 can be bumped as it's not a blocker,
>> but I
>>> should be able to run the tests I had asked Sean to do locally here and
>>> speed things up.
>>>
>>> I think I also owe Sean a read through on ACCUMULO-4421. Let me try to
>> help
>>> there too.
>>>
>>>
>>> Michael Wall wrote:
>>>> I was going to make another RC for 1.8.0, but we have open 4 tickets.
>> See
>>>> 1.8.0
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO/fixforversion/12329879>
>>>>
>>>> Dave, Sean and Christopher, please take a look at these tickets and move
>>>> them to 1.8.1 or let me know a timeframe for completion?  I can take a
>>>> look
>>>> at ACCUMULO-4425<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4425>
>>>> since
>>>> it is unassigned if it need to stay in 1.8.0.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> busbey
>>
>

Mime
View raw message