Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL5zq9bCgHoE_YExpQL7CPJ8AOcj5YgJnRaMzcC+7jQkm9mqSA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL5zq9YQyLw0pfDrPdgvaS=ASphnKxptLShet70f0FxPeaGBAQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF1jEfD_QUy=59E1M4Mghfx0a6cQBqRS0VGtKkdVoD9=iOZyyQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL5zq9bCgHoE_YExpQL7CPJ8AOcj5YgJnRaMzcC+7jQkm9mqSA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:19:49 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGHyZ6LrQK9R0ZjjKSvFpeMmOgWYKHDVA2TFx319a2XRoLG7TA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Htrace4, Hadoop 2.7
To: "dev@accumulo apache. org" <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
archived-at: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 15:20:15 -0000

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:
> Ah, my mistake. I thought it was 2.7 and later. Well, then I guess the
> question is whether we should bump to 2.8, then. I'm not a fan of the shim
> layer. I'd rather provide support for downstream packagers trying to
> backport for HTrace3, if anybody ends up requiring that, than provide a
> shim to preserve use of the older HTrace.
>

Hadoop 2.8 isn't out yet, though it now has no blockers listed in
JIRA. We could ask the Hadoop community what their current thoughts
are on timing. Hadoop 3 has a release manager that has said an initial
alpha release is "close", so maybe we'd be dealing with that first.


> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:30 PM Billie Rinaldi <billie.rinaldi@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm in favor of bumping our Hadoop version to 2.7. We are already on the
>> same htrace version as Hadoop 2.7. (The discussion in ACCUMULO-4171 is
>> relevant to Hadoop 2.8 and later.)
>>
>> Billie
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Thinking about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4171, I'm
>> of
>> > the opinion that we should probably bump our Hadoop version to 2.7 and
>> > HTrace version to what Hadoop is using, to keep them in sync.
>> >
>> > Does anybody disagree?
>> >
>>

Would we be bumping the Hadoop version while incrementing our minor
version number or our major version number?


-- 
busbey