Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL5zq9aJFykUsvaEx13C9qGqjeGNYL+trH6t5PSdXRBN3oAP_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL5zq9ZYAPsaLWw2+BpT6SZmE-5CgcXrHjBdQxohRy0UtscQkA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAL5zq9aJFykUsvaEx13C9qGqjeGNYL+trH6t5PSdXRBN3oAP_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:42:35 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGHyZ6+dkMW+kfOcyAvb4oOG4DywfCSYZVxkFp2=xq+1RMzO7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed binary packaging changes
To: "dev@accumulo apache. org" <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
archived-at: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 23:43:06 -0000

Sounds good. Please post a link here to the JIRA?


On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 5:43 PM Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to bring to your attention
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4356, for discussion. Feel
>> free to comment here or on the issue.
>>
>
> Reading back through all the replies, I don't see a *strong* consensus, but
> it does seem like there's some acceptance of my proposal (perhaps with some
> reservations).
>
> It seems people are mostly "okay" with this, so long as it's pushed off to
> the future (2.0+), and is accompanied by some automated way of downloading
> dependency jars, and collating their LICENSE/NOTICE files.
>
> So, unless there's more discussion here, my intention is to proceed to
> create a pull request against the 2.0 branch (currently: master) which
> replaces our assembly bundling with a downloader script. That way, if
> there's any additional feedback on the specific implementation, folks will
> be able to comment directly on that.


-- 
busbey