accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From William Slacum <wsla...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed binary packaging changes
Date Fri, 01 Jul 2016 19:46:41 GMT
Yeah, I wasn't really suggesting it as a course of action. It was more of a
mental exercise so I could grasp the issue better.

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM William Slacum <wslacum@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is another action we could take be adding profiles for each version of
> > dependencies to include appropriate dependencies (and dependencies'
> > metadata)?
> >
> >
> That could be a potentially huge number of profiles, and it would add a lot
> of complexity which is certainly going to suffer from lack of maintenance
> over time. I really think this kind of thing (integration) is a distinct
> responsibility better suited to external/downstream tasks than
> internal/upstream.
>
>
> > I guess right now the problem is we throw in a generic "one size fits
> all"
> > distribution, and we're seeing the cracks in it?
> >
> >
> Yes. That's my opinion.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message