accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed binary packaging changes
Date Wed, 06 Jul 2016 01:41:53 GMT
I assume you mean pull request. (JIRA link is below). Will do.

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016, 19:43 Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Sounds good. Please post a link here to the JIRA?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 5:43 PM Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'd like to bring to your attention
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4356, for discussion.
> Feel
> >> free to comment here or on the issue.
> >>
> >
> > Reading back through all the replies, I don't see a *strong* consensus,
> but
> > it does seem like there's some acceptance of my proposal (perhaps with
> some
> > reservations).
> >
> > It seems people are mostly "okay" with this, so long as it's pushed off
> to
> > the future (2.0+), and is accompanied by some automated way of
> downloading
> > dependency jars, and collating their LICENSE/NOTICE files.
> >
> > So, unless there's more discussion here, my intention is to proceed to
> > create a pull request against the 2.0 branch (currently: master) which
> > replaces our assembly bundling with a downloader script. That way, if
> > there's any additional feedback on the specific implementation, folks
> will
> > be able to comment directly on that.
>
>
>
> --
> busbey
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message