Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C70200B16 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:51:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 166B7160A55; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 609F2160A26 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:51:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 73239 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2016 16:51:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 73228 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2016 16:51:05 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:51:05 +0000 Received: from hw10447.local (207.155.208.210.ptr.us.xo.net [207.155.208.210]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 139A21A022A for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <57681EF6.8090801@apache.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:51:02 -0400 From: Josh Elser User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.2-rc2 References: <5767462A.2060506@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:51:07 -0000 My understanding was that you don't need the "developed at the Apache Software Foundation" line, but the copyright line was still necessary. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundle-asf-product However, I forget about LEGAL-234. It looks like we just dropped the ball to correct both our NOTICE files and the "licensing howto" documentation. Thanks for reminding me, Christopher. This changes my -1 to a +1 (binding). Let's also get issues filed to fix this stuff before the next release (to avoid this one again). Mike Drob wrote: > Ah, I didn't see this response while composing my other one. A similar > question then, Christopher. Do we need to remove all the individual project > lines? > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Christopher wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:26 PM Josh Elser wrote: >> >>> -1 (binding) >>> >>> HTrace's NOTICE is missing in -bin's NOTICE file >>> >>> """ >>> htrace-core >>> Copyright 2015 The Apache Software Foundation >>> """ >>> >>> >> The NOTICE file should not have entries for other ASF-copyrighted >> materials. The ones that are there already should not be there. This was >> discussed on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-234 with the >> conclusion that these were superfluous and the NOTICE could be simplified >> by omitting these. The fact that these aren't necessary, and the general >> instructions to omit anything that isn't legally required ( >> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice), means these >> shouldn't be there. >> >> I provide this information in case it changes your vote. >> >> >>> The good: >>> >>> * Can run with bin tarball out of the box. Simple write/read/update/read >>> works in the shell. >>> * `mvn verify -Psunny` passes on src tarball >>> * xsums/sigs are fine. >>> * Good on you using the long-form keyid >>> * Verified no Thrift changes (accounting for the !thrift) >>> * Verified no changes to public API code (to avoid running japi) >>> >>> Sorry, Mike. Wish I could've caught this one on rc1. >>> >>> - Josh >>> >>> Mike Drob wrote: >>>> Accumulo Developers, >>>> >>>> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.7.2. >>>> >>>> All content generated via >>>> assemble/build.sh --create-release-candidate -P '!thrift' >>>> >>>> Changes from 1.7.2-rc1 >>>> >>>> ACCUMULO-4346 correct LICENSE file for source to include text of >>> reference >>>> ACCUMULO-4347 Crypto notification should be in README files instead of >>>> NOTICE >>>> >>>> Git Commit: >>>> a01e67741d101c3d87f1d6e16d54ff7a96951ad0 >>>> Branch: >>>> 1.7.2-rc2 >>>> >>>> If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using: >>>> git tag -f -m 'Apache Accumulo 1.7.2' -s rel/1.7.2 >>>> a01e67741d101c3d87f1d6e16d54ff7a96951ad0 >>>> >>>> Staging repo: >>>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1052 >>>> Source (official release artifact): >>>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1052/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.2/accumulo-1.7.2-src.tar.gz >>>> Binary: >>>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1052/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.2/accumulo-1.7.2-bin.tar.gz >>>> (Append ".sha1", ".md5", or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a >>>> given artifact.) >>>> >>>> All artifacts were built and staged with: >>>> mvn release:prepare&& mvn release:perform >>>> >>>> Signing keys are available at >> https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS >>>> (Expected fingerprint: 86EDB9C33B8517228E88A8F93E48C0C6EF362B9E) >>>> >>>> Release notes (in progress) can be found at: >>>> https://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.7.2 >>>> >>>> Please vote one of: >>>> [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept... >>>> [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against... >>>> [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept... >>>> ... these artifacts as the 1.7.2 release of Apache Accumulo. >>>> >>>> This vote will end on Tue Jun 21 05:00:00 UTC 2016 >>>> (Tue Jun 21 01:00:00 EDT 2016 / Mon Jun 20 22:00:00 PDT 2016) >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with >>>> wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH \ >>>> >>>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1052/ >>>> # note the trailing slash is needed >>>> >