Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A021F2009F4 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 19:05:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 9EF48160A18; Thu, 26 May 2016 17:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E3DA9160A17 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 19:05:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 25977 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2016 17:05:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 25963 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2016 17:05:16 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2016 17:05:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0AA41C0599 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 17:05:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.721 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.721 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudera-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jWwQgIVeqB6X for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 17:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com (mail-lb0-f179.google.com [209.85.217.179]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 6DAA15F4E5 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 17:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id k7so26328736lbm.0 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:05:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudera-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ysuDznmVX/YapN1UW3p9WSEtKA/9mG1BSLMUpcR16Yg=; b=r2H+2sCEyvmzjLC2+6nYQUsAAoSwgm45IRu+Jmh9+Oon4R2RAM7GODn3N5gjSsnIxL waoY8R80oiq932o/L2IrjlRYUtN0/2ws/Gh64QqFFLz6v73VI/Hbz7vYZ/VhisPk9bFx EQx56hXNU6mx6frpfvR2uNBQIBwVMPH3JzdWX26RyyflUzzjli2p6sAgr9QoWuTFRbiv aAbJuqOLcSpu283qzbevGU0NzOu9c62H8J00f8DR9kyCaIwPK/YcsQWctkD5Ukg/eUE7 so8PZMhaXCtPYICiqreRwfr9xr959tPEQKzTTu5TDuR9TcF+iwkBEzk7yY3x4ZVc9NTJ oEtw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ysuDznmVX/YapN1UW3p9WSEtKA/9mG1BSLMUpcR16Yg=; b=YLEHu4oS0dRvSnERjR6oYqttzvX+dPMx0TO4RDyp9LQL87hg3AD3k6NLoaA61K0Mr4 fthLCWv8TFhpJ0oI6pRJ5r/HYj6r8aRruYCfsHtfx/FmQoTCzNDL9inDzqxl1BXY3ckl kZNadZn6VrdEeQYORfPmJ8q/DTzWf0T+qIScysroGjupx+XagAvzuIsq64lPlWQZKmJr 4Viocwi4Sd/KfVqxsMPuQjUhmRdmun8D9sBoqTUGckyRWqUj9Ta0q5wuDm5/FAqUTtks e0d69K4gEfHPRsz4hAs/kJrI+KmVGNxuQtDMNGHkoJ2fzHV+FfuH44arT+KMVMSpVjnj B5Tg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLafu6rULnSZ/osBABkyVK3PWU0feUlgcj562CztNNGrDYbprZvAR2JVnRV3j3s4fGIbbyDGXCvk+QqvvEB X-Received: by 10.112.25.106 with SMTP id b10mr3162896lbg.5.1464282305563; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:05:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.20.230 with HTTP; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:04:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Sean Busbey Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:04:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.7.2 To: "dev@accumulo apache. org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Thu, 26 May 2016 17:05:18 -0000 Do the folks assigned to those issues believe they'll be ready by e.g. Wednesday next week? Since it's been ~3 months I'd rather release the stuff we have if it'll take much longer than that. I'd be willing to commit to RM a 1.7.3 in a month if it makes folks more comfortable bumping things out. On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > I made a first pass at triaging issues; apologies for the JIRA spam. > > I've deferred most issues that were either trivial or minor or unassigned, > so we are currently left with 10 open, most of which look like IT failures > and also apply to 1.8.0. I'm currently thinking that ACCUMULO-4157, > ACCUMULO-4314, and ACCUMULO-2990 may be the only issues worth waiting on. > > Mike > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > >> i would like to get ACCUMULO-4314 in for 1.7.2. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4314 >> >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Mike Drob wrote: >> >> > Following up on the 1.8.0 release thread, maybe we should also get a >> 1.7.2 >> > release going as well. I'll probably go through and move issues out to >> > 1.7.3 either this week or next week. Does anybody have issues that they >> > believe are blockers for 1.7.2? >> > >> > Mike >> > >> -- busbey