Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65783200B21 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 02:38:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 64516160A2B; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id A94C2160A18 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 02:38:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 28100 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2016 00:38:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 28077 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2016 00:38:15 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:38:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 208C0180219 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:38:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LIB2rwGkauqe for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com (mail-ig0-f178.google.com [209.85.213.178]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 20B8C5F263 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f178.google.com with SMTP id ww4so99746453igb.1 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 17:38:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=38WxdBJ11tdbyJ7tXVQqeFJ39ywuN8VKHJ+yBpHBZkY=; b=FzcudUuD+fNMkn7XytYE8XESQcAfeH4lE3ynDL3KtFkfZ5k7bvfunstbXuEvdboUu+ eOhugvD4Lrp9uXIrs8Ea/xY1eGTInKb2gEaR1Un7rNVrdFIzx2zXRqlHHw2LHl9nkKPy TKNgfL4pCwbLh2BMZvOzYddQCHdqcat0v0DIZK1BnJih9Amm6UMlTK5L5JddLwxnFK/L tdHPZgv5cu3zxDG6gXxJX2xg6cjBme/nTqfUwSBGfqxRdMOXhCPMgTvio+HVX31NKIxM hy5hl3RkA3YhGhT6LROLyCbScajsNxHt2NEyRlwiaMZIb51IbCpc/e11rILsuHa1dGOc 2pew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=38WxdBJ11tdbyJ7tXVQqeFJ39ywuN8VKHJ+yBpHBZkY=; b=l+q+5WGk2USkQgcl6/wGC2S6D2t9BhsnhWQIQ122fVg8k1wOrrodql4hz0LDsmZFi8 CzQwG1txRa+SY7Y1ST+9YOQcqkK/nFcVEWQ3cvpD5BCdL5IoogOv5tHt3cmIriowAJog 07Foq+eW2p8zuazEjPovRX5FaoSIeM1n55+SVSAW80IPxH8x7LKeiP7gREspkDmuuI3n StAhD/KUeXNexjTywoawT+SOhtGDDSSa0ubiVm0ebXkUsUNG4TnmvS9C6bap6wqTUZgN 71XAd9caLdxGfwKW5JvF0zH4OPKUP68v/mBz0q+6lozmLNHs/5XTh4oMe6wXTdzdo2Eg KF5A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIzbFBMhyVqfQEf6A3SOMltIJwKblZgQFMlKvE71t5PKDXNZvC2Z0o/SDlZkwBEtaZnVEXb27mSPOKv1w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.110.71 with SMTP id hy7mr5325205igb.97.1464309492079; Thu, 26 May 2016 17:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.7.92 with HTTP; Thu, 26 May 2016 17:38:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 17:38:11 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Jira/GitHub spam reduction thoughts From: Billie Rinaldi To: Accumulo Dev List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01184d781dfac10533c81f9b archived-at: Fri, 27 May 2016 00:38:17 -0000 --089e01184d781dfac10533c81f9b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Christopher wrote: > Billie, are you able to make this change, or should I file an INFRA ticket? > No, I don't have the karma, so you'll have to open an INFRA ticket. +1 for the change, though. > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:10 PM Christopher wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:46 AM Billie Rinaldi < > billie.rinaldi@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Christopher > wrote: > >> > >> > Okay, so after all that work I did on > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11675 , we were able to > get > >> > the > >> > duplicate messages on the notifications list to stop, which came from > >> > comments on GitHub pull requests which also triggered emails about > >> comments > >> > from JIRA. > >> > > >> > However, it now appears that watchers are still getting these. While > >> JIRA > >> > is not sending notifications to the mailing list, it is sending it to > >> > watchers, reporters, and assignees. > >> > > >> > I believe the relevant setting is "Work Logged On Issue": > >> > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/ACCUMULO/notifications > >> > > >> > I think this is a recent thing. I don't recall ever getting extra > emails > >> > about work being logged on issues I was watching before. Was this > >> related > >> > to the switch from the Hadoop permissions model to the default > >> permissions > >> > model as part of the JIRA mitigation? > >> > > >> > >> As far as I am aware, the notifications scheme was not changed due to > JIRA > >> spam. Yes, I think notification settings are one of things only INFRA > can > >> change. On the bright side, it appears we are on the "Accumulo > >> Notifications Scheme," which makes it sound like it wouldn't be as hard > to > >> get custom changes for notifications as it is for permissions (INFRA > >> really > >> wants projects to use an existing permissions scheme). Are you > suggesting > >> we try to get watchers removed from the Work Logged On Issue > >> notifications? > >> What about the assignee and reporter? > >> > >> > > Yes, I think all 3 should be removed. The only things publishing to the > > worklog are things we already get notified of on the mailing list (git > > commits and pull request activity, for example). It's only useful in the > > timeline view of all the activity on the issue, retrospectively... it's > not > > really useful to be actively notified. (At least, that's true today... in > > the future, people could start publishing other activity to the worklog > > where we don't already have email notifications for, but I don't > anticipate > > that). > > > > > --089e01184d781dfac10533c81f9b--