accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.7.2
Date Thu, 26 May 2016 17:14:17 GMT
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Do the folks assigned to those issues believe they'll be ready by e.g.
> Wednesday next week?
>

I think I can get ACCUMULO-4314 done quickly because its just taking a
subset of work done for ACCUMULO-1124.  If I can not get to it, I don't
want to hold things up.  I'm in favor of a deadline of next week Wed.


>
> Since it's been ~3 months I'd rather release the stuff we have if
> it'll take much longer than that. I'd be willing to commit to RM a
> 1.7.3 in a month if it makes folks more comfortable bumping things
> out.
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Mike Drob <mdrob@apache.org> wrote:
> > I made a first pass at triaging issues; apologies for the JIRA spam.
> >
> > I've deferred most issues that were either trivial or minor or
> unassigned,
> > so we are currently left with 10 open, most of which look like IT
> failures
> > and also apply to 1.8.0. I'm currently thinking that ACCUMULO-4157,
> > ACCUMULO-4314, and ACCUMULO-2990 may be the only issues worth waiting on.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> i would like to get ACCUMULO-4314 in for 1.7.2.
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4314
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Mike Drob <mdrob@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Following up on the 1.8.0 release thread, maybe we should also get a
> >> 1.7.2
> >> > release going as well. I'll probably go through and move issues out to
> >> > 1.7.3 either this week or next week. Does anybody have issues that
> they
> >> > believe are blockers for 1.7.2?
> >> >
> >> > Mike
> >> >
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> busbey
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message