Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D27E919032 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14305 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2016 14:08:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 14255 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2016 14:08:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 14243 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2016 14:08:52 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:08:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C6847180481 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:08:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.198 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.198 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V4sR963dYXmF for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com (mail-io0-f178.google.com [209.85.223.178]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 4B7AB5F241 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f178.google.com with SMTP id f89so77853769ioi.0 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:08:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=MGtQKhsRThFlSB1GNEBz9lxeo1C93kGYsg+Z86JyTEg=; b=q6riXbUabgIo/dDSOsLHek5YABjQK4JVE4qlIGnKTvtOnsFnbvJN4RrQtvNrwfOwqH 5S2nW7CA3mRBp162TA7mPSeHcOaTlgt+5WeCKOMGVKIN+OEbcA0VWQFe2LXelmWUJyUP OPsjE0wt3hORXA/0tnPl2VMdEtyiv5Idcxpm8g2gqlP5f8iWawbQbpytomepOt6Us51T DKb7/sMtu5c756XU9PAaKaeH647OYWebs4/C/cend0asPlyK+lrzLF3OFRioxHxflsHl xHfplYApNavprl4BjP1bXgsDIKDL9/bO+JQXK5rh7OcCwXpzJNgt0VuI6oxTOWAA/+/O fsIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=MGtQKhsRThFlSB1GNEBz9lxeo1C93kGYsg+Z86JyTEg=; b=J9/tTN9S98kVii1C4jimHqJzW4XlqkSd1QjL8x00yP+K/hfoM4+MhvRUL2zq7oB2J+ EQeFyGEQBrYmIYKBHNgjW4ovJPT4skZH99TlrLeA8mVBQuew2AQ71PulufiMUAay4Fws sBUnb9Y0FCfdRqG4Qqzv6AC0T13beV5Fcraqq3YtxRN7auVs3UAJP+PeEBc8dVayff5t kP94O/LjkujkzwKs4TiSvOhTsOEbp2H51QBWH/ala8Vhsoyx639qGix2ajSEl2q466n4 JR+IUy8tKQyZzQaMyj5NNq8FB4vvbZTbVF5UpWrjnHvYFeysFuPHOdyexjVIqi5+R4uP KnuA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUDKodnxsuYko6H7Bh+syUGwBlaQjwEYoBX2b0SPfbp2Dy19zqkS8Px38erMKTuHZhgTEijOJpeX2/tnA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.2.70 with SMTP id 67mr18727578ioc.70.1461852528651; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.134.200 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:08:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:08:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can someone review the change I made to the project RDF before I push to asf-site From: Billie Rinaldi To: Accumulo Dev List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11396814af362605318c10ec --001a11396814af362605318c10ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I spot-checked four of the projects listed in the database category, and they all used http rather than https. Did you see any examples that used https? Since our category is already broken, I'd be okay with pushing to see if it works, and if it doesn't then we could revert 0554092; or we could just revert that now to match the other projects. In any case, +1 for 3154c1d. On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael Wall wrote: > I noticed our category was not parsing correctly at > > https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category > > Search Accumulo. > > I updated it in the gh-pages branch with > > https://github.com/apache/accumulo/commit/3154c1dc1386850aa9bdcee27b71045bad01623b > and > > https://github.com/apache/accumulo/commit/0554092a5fe2b69bee0071130e69e9f42fa5ecde > > Can someone else review this before I push to the asf-site branch? > > Thanks > > Mike > --001a11396814af362605318c10ec--