accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
Subject Re: 1.6 Javadoc missing classes
Date Fri, 04 Mar 2016 22:34:17 GMT
The tracing APIs vary from version to version significantly. That puts a
lot of extra effort on the person updating the included packages. How
important are those now we're transitioning to use an external dependency?

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 5:17 PM Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe the distributed tracing APIs?
>
> Christopher wrote:
> > Sure, we can include that. Are there any other classes which would be
> > good to have javadocs for which aren't public API?
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:03 PM Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com
> > <mailto:josh.elser@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Good catch, Dan. Thanks for letting us know. Moving this one over to
> the
> >     dev list to discuss further.
> >
> >     Christopher, looks like it might also be good to include iterator
> >     javadocs despite not being in public API (interfaces, and
> >     o.a.a.c.i.user?).
> >
> >     -------- Original Message --------
> >     Subject: 1.6 Javadoc missing classes
> >     Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 15:59:26 -0500
> >     From: Dan Blum <dblum@bbn.com <mailto:dblum@bbn.com>>
> >     Reply-To: user@accumulo.apache.org <mailto:user@accumulo.apache.org>
> >     To: <user@accumulo.apache.org <mailto:user@accumulo.apache.org>>
> >
> >     A lot of classes seem to have gone missing from
> >     http://accumulo.apache.org/1.6/apidocs/ - SortedKeyValueIterator
> >     would be an
> >     obvious example.
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message