accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: git-based site and jekyll
Date Tue, 08 Mar 2016 21:21:22 GMT
Lazy consensus is fine. If there are no objections, I don't want to hold 
things up. I feel like I've adequately expressed my concerns. Silence 
can and should be treated as acknowledgement for this, IMO.

Christopher wrote:
> Another reason we probably shouldn't worry about this: anybody can create a
> DNS name at their leisure which transparently redirects to
> accumulo.apache.org and serves its contents. This is perfectly legitimate
> for a number of reasons, including corporate proxies/mirrors,
> URL-shortening services, caching services, archiving services,
> vision-impaired accessibility services, foreign-language DNS mappings, and
> so-on.
>
> I think when it comes to trademarks and our website, our area of concern
> should mostly focus on when people misrepresent our trademark in the course
> of their mirroring/archiving. There's no risk of that for a mirror that is
> explicitly under our control, but I'm really leaning towards the javascript
> to detect and display a message about the canonical location just to
> mitigate any possibility for concern.
>
> If you still have concerns, I'd be happy to put it up for a formal vote
> from the PMC, or to get feedback from ASF trademarks folks before we
> proceed.
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:22 PM Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> Well, I think the difference is that archive.org (and others -- google
>> cached pages come to mind) are devoted/known for that specific purpose.
>> The fact that Github ends up being a "de-facto" location for software
>> projects, I'm just nervous about the expecting good faith from the
>> denizens of the internet. Maybe I'm just worrying too much. If there's
>> sufficient "it'll be ok" opinion coming from the PMC, it's fine by me.
>>
>> Christopher wrote:
>>> I can't imagine there's a trademark issue since it's really just acting
>> as
>>> a mirror. If there were trademark issues, I imagine sites like
>>> http://archive.org would be in big trouble. But, it certainly couldn't
>> hurt
>>> to find out.
>>>
>>> Another option to sabotage the GH-rendered site is to add some javascript
>>> which detects the location and displays an informative link back to the
>>> canonical location for the site. That should be simple enough to do.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:36 PM Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>   wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's also probably worth mentioning that this concern only comes about
>>>> for point #4 (or if we use the branch name gh-pages in point #1).
>>>>
>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>> The one concern I had was regarding automatic rendering of what would
>>>>> look like "the Apache Accumulo website" on Github (both apache/accumulo
>>>>> github account and other forks).
>>>>>
>>>>> Christopher had said that no one seemed to object in comdev@ when he
>>>>> talked about this a while back. I wanted to make sure everyone
>>>>> considered this (for example, Christopher's fork of Drill's repository
>>>>> now also looks like a canonical host of the Apache Drill project). I'm
>>>>> not actively stating that I think it's an issue at this point, only
>>>>> suggesting that we give it some thought and maybe ask someone who is
>>>>> more knowledgable (Shane from trademarks?) before moving forward. The
>>>>> worst case I envision is that we find some way to "gimp" the
>>>>> github-rendered site (redirect back to the canonical
>> accumulo.apache.org
>>>>> or similar).
>>>>>
>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>> I got some information back from INFRA about how the git-based sites
>>>>>> work.
>>>>>> It's just plain old static hosting of a git branch. So, whatever
we'd
>>>> put
>>>>>> in a specified branch would show up directly on the site, no rendering
>>>> or
>>>>>> generation. This would completely bypass CMS and buildbot staging
>>>> builds.
>>>>>> Was discussing this with elserj in IRC, and these ideas came out
of
>>>> that:
>>>>>> 1. Switch site to use git branch named "site" or "website" or similar.
>>>>>> 2. Use jekyll 3 to generate the static site contents in this git
>> branch.
>>>>>> 3. Store the unrendered (markdown) jekyll stuff in a gh-pages branch.
>>>>>> 4. Possibly set up a post-commit hook on gh-pages branch to render
>>>>>> locally
>>>>>> and commit the generated static site to the "site" branch.
>

Mime
View raw message