Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAL5zq9Z7RJia3XR+=D0D+HMQ11LyZRJxH+f3195EPcd+dhP2gw@mail.gmail.com>
 <56BD10B0.70900@apache.org>
 <CAGHyZ6LH5Fz5KMWmmkzQ+okwM_veMB7ukV194KEhLtrW1TcDiQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGHyZ6LH5Fz5KMWmmkzQ+okwM_veMB7ukV194KEhLtrW1TcDiQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 21:02:39 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CAL5zq9Z+1nEeYc-Jem+rmGQsKVhK=oFG9avdv4YvvKwSjO=jNg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.5-rc1
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114dac44635c4a052b98fdf7

--001a114dac44635c4a052b98fdf7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:48 PM Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com> wrote:

> -1
>
> bad:
> * Also ran into the copyright year thing and it matters to me enough to
> vote -1 (I understand that we're majority vote)
>

Fixed in rc2


> * the PDF we're publishing contains no copyright statements or an indicator
> that the content is under the ASLv2 (ACCUMULO-4144)
>    I don't think the PDF would be enough by itself to vote -1, since we
> could just excise it from the maven repo for non-conformance after the
> fact.
>
>
Non-conformance to what, specifically? Can you link to specific guidance
for it to conform to? I'd rather make it conformant than excise it. A PDF
on its own (HTML we could at least put in HTML comment tags if nothing
else)... is not clear in any guidance I've read.


> good:
> * all sigs + checksums look good
> * all L&N files look good
> * src tarball matches proposed tag commit
> * src builds given binary artifacts
>
> mix of:
> * link to in-progress release notes 404s
>

It didn't exist when I put out the vote, but it should be on staging now
(at least). Use CMS or SVN to view, if you get a 404.


> * I couldn't get a clean run of unit + ITs, but the failures don't look
> like severe issues, let me know if any of these make folks think we need a
> jira (rather than just being flakes):
>
> [snip]
The first two are already fixed (ACCUMULO-4139, ACCUMULO-4143)
I didn't see the TracerRecoversAfterOfflineTableIT failure, but I have seen
the ConditionalWriterIT.testTrace() failure on several occasions. I'm not
sure what's going on here. Perhaps something specific to the tracer... a
startup delay resulting in dropped traces... or something along those
lines? If you want to help troubleshoot those, I'd be very grateful.

And this one kept waiting for the tracer without recovering for ~5 hours:
>
> Running org.apache.accumulo.test.TracerRecoversAfterOfflineTableIT
>
> This one also hung around not finishing for ~5 hours before I killed it:
>
> org.apache.accumulo.test.ConditionalWriterIT_testTrace
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > -0
> >
> > * Copyright year is wrong in NOTICE -- ACCUMULO-4142
> > * src L&N look ok (sans 4142)
> > * bin L&N look ok (sans 4142)
> > * Built src, ran all tests (ran into ACCUMULO-4139, ACCUMULO-4143 and a
> > intermittent failure on ConditionalWriterIT#testTrace which I've seen
> > before).
> > * Checked fwd/rev bin/src compatibility
> > * Sigs/xsums are good.
> >
> > I think we should get Christopher's fix for ACCUMULO-4143 and fix the
> > NOTICE files, then kick off a new RC. My guess is that 1.6.5 is going to
> be
> > the last 1.6 release, as such, I'd rather we fix these nit-picky things
> so
> > we don't feel obligated for a 1.6.6 before EOL.
> >
> > Christopher wrote:
> >
> >> Accumulo Developers,
> >>
> >> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.5.
> >>
> >> Git Commit:
> >>      2263fabd57e765ab14fc47a146b1e2d443e705ca
> >> Branch:
> >>      1.6.5-rc1
> >>
> >> If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using:
> >>      git tag -f -m 'Apache Accumulo 1.6.5' -s rel/1.6.5
> >> 2263fabd57e765ab14fc47a146b1e2d443e705ca
> >>
> >> Staging repo:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1047
> >> Source (official release artifact):
> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1047/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.5/accumulo-1.6.5-src.tar.gz
> >> Binary:
> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1047/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.5/accumulo-1.6.5-bin.tar.gz
> >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5", or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> >> given artifact.)
> >>
> >> All artifacts were built and staged with:
> >>      mvn release:prepare&&  mvn release:perform
> >>
> >> Signing keys are available at https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> >> (Expected fingerprint: 8CC4F8A2B29C2B040F2B835D6F0CDAE700B6899D)
> >>
> >> Release notes (in progress) can be found at:
> >> https://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.5
> >>
> >> Please vote one of:
> >> [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> >> [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
> >> [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> >> ... these artifacts as the 1.6.5 release of Apache Accumulo.
> >>
> >> This vote will end on Fri Feb 12 19:30:00 UTC 2016
> >> (Fri Feb 12 14:30:00 EST 2016 / Fri Feb 12 11:30:00 PST 2016)
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> >>      wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH \
> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1047/
> >>      # note the trailing slash is needed
> >>
> >>
>
>
> --
> Sean
>

--001a114dac44635c4a052b98fdf7--