Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D4EE1801B for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 18:59:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21191 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2016 18:59:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 21140 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2016 18:59:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 21123 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2016 18:58:59 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 18:58:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6FDA3C179A for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 18:58:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.636 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.636 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=0.726, HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CTvvsIdIcVrl for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 18:58:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 7A50925897 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id b14so185193889wmb.1 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:58:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=PXl8E68xpWTgGT2lk0t1Vw8xdQdirejRYuy0yw+nTx8=; b=Ws4EoDUc/OWMt/RjV2tBFSmA1wG5pQ0W2Vsy5sIevu2mp3BJIgjktOYYxnxGZS6LpX dmAl5RUjTkBjssc1qpA5KSoyVvelBz3Ti88Y+wsMncQzC4AuTcxxp4C9TPuT0sclB6+f t7l5CEeBgFk6ByAhZoKgbK40+16cfNP0KTTbcfcj6WZcenDXfoSA1nfUU9Ms7u0jc3mX t6d2jrozUf4ZWFHEUiZaDMIa2sfLuaNjkiRWW3c8RKmjj9wHPp36EzXo3lvvcLFgZxXq r1WEqwxRqicYNWFmRoAtPUaU6sDz2SemUet7HQj2Bu6TiWTR5RMGx2sFvz17jxcnw9Qd lvBw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.57.100 with SMTP id h4mr115388563wjq.21.1452279530174; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:58:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.140.77 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:58:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <568FF0D4.3040108@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 13:58:50 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Enable PreCommit build From: Chris Rigano To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba9805682c7690528d72d58 --047d7ba9805682c7690528d72d58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Please drop me from this list. On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Per the other thread "Yetus Accumulo 'Personality'" [1], I'd like to see > > what people think about turning this on by default. > > > > I've been talking to Sean in chat today who had made a suggestion that we > > get our own JIRA acct instead of the "Hadoop QA" user. Aside from that, > I'm > > pretty happy with this. > > > > There is likely further tweaking we can do (e.g. multijdk builds, try the > > sunny-day ITs). One big concern is the presence of a -1/+1 in an CTR > > community. We would need some docs to be clear that the PreCommit comment > > is a tool for vetting contributions, not a bar that must be satisfied > prior > > to commit (this is a simple website update). > > > > Anywho -- if you have opinions, please let them be heard now. If there > > isn't any argument against, I'll move ahead with this in time. > > > > > > [1] > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/accumulo-dev/201601.mbox/%3C568B5BFC.2080209@gmail.com%3E > > > -- ========================= Christopher P. Rigano WWGD? Namaste --047d7ba9805682c7690528d72d58--