Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7C1118CFD for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 19:32:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19115 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2015 19:32:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 19070 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2015 19:32:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 19059 invoked by uid 99); 10 Sep 2015 19:32:52 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 19:32:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1D6FA1A0CE1 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 19:32:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZuaplmZTbQ5n for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 19:32:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com (mail-io0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 91BF243C66 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 19:32:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ioii196 with SMTP id i196so73367199ioi.3 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:32:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FVu2fXcm89yE4tGjKi12B21TGtACF21jtGBZxNH0v/g=; b=KVpBd61hTuiO736/3FnJhTxhr5dfq600D62m+9VZZ+iW5ZZMSvSQ/BS8On3B3fyTRg dKSEuHYHju6QVsw+KNQV4MeBmsJ8YdeGFrg/2/QDyp2qpmYyZtXduC91a6m3a5Kx4z5f 0F4ZBcW1dbqU/s3TrT0X3QX8toa/7WJMC/xqWRh8m2/N4m8DIWzDPZ8pwZQwQax1ohzy OfChRyw4Y5A4aVZNvDaaV9/mu/3wTCRfs3V8GARv8far9Hob/Qe2m74Lbbkke8eGc3l8 gIhaFC8MHbxJbzCUbFaKJkoMzONLCSbjXY3156m5i8I/bZRwrj4n3rSpbjf1HUi1Xzxa yM0g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkxEx+9JtPhCceN9bJ1lPfJ5cgSOYdVLoSJBYrgmyjJ37cLn8/9UL6xxX84YT0BxAeI4gRg MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.170.32 with SMTP id t32mr65406488ioe.173.1441913563978; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.202.135 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:32:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [98.195.174.102] In-Reply-To: References: <55EB5E49.209@apache.org> <55F1AFE8.3090306@apache.org> <55F1D380.50109@apache.org> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:32:43 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.5.4-rc1 From: Mike Drob To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142edfcc750b8051f69a904 --001a1142edfcc750b8051f69a904 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 -1. Having correct licences is more important than even having code that compiles (at release time). On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > On Sep 10, 2015 2:07 PM, "Christopher" wrote: > > > > > > > However, I don't know where the "willful copyright infringement" comes > > from. Omission of the LICENSE/NOTICE files is not necessarily an > infringing > > activity. They are acknowledgments/disclaimers of the legal status of the > > code we use. As such, they do not generally change the rights we have to > > redistribute under their respective licenses. They simply communicate > them. > > So, I think that part was a bit of hyperbole. > > > > The bloomfilter code is included under a license that includes requirements > about notifying where it came from. In the binary jar for accumulo-core we > include no such notice about the provenance or copyright. That invalidates > the license, which means we'd be distributing the work without a license in > violation of the original authors' copyrights. > --001a1142edfcc750b8051f69a904--