accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Post 1.5.3 and 1.6.3
Date Wed, 08 Jul 2015 22:25:18 GMT
Also, might be worthwhile to look at thrift 0.9.2 for 1.8

For kerberos, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2660.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2274 might be a concern for 
us too (would have to check).

Josh Elser wrote:
> Some thoughts myself...
>
> John Vines brought up to me privately the topic of separating out the
> RFile code from core. This started making me think about making this
> clear for other components like FATE and RandomWalk. These all have some
> level of separation, but they often get other things dropped into the
> same bucket (e.g. ZK-retry code in FATE, Accumulo implementation classes
> in RandomWalk). Maybe there are more things we could do.
>
> It would be nice to start trying to pull out these
> frameworks/sub-projects into discrete packages. I think it would help us
> with testing and proper separation of logic. Long term, maybe other
> projects would see the value and consider using/adopting them and grow
> into their own separately-versioned artifacts. It would be nice to start
> these efforts now to eventually reap the benefits.
>
>
> 2.0 and the new client API is a little scary now that we get another
> tick closer to it. I know it's been Christopher's brain-child so far
> (which is fine -- not meant to be taken in a negative context), but, if
> we really do want to adopt it, we should make a concerted effort to
> start integrating and reviewing it. Given how far away this seems, 1.8
> and 1.9 could happen (or client API just gets targeted for a 3.0 --
> numbers are just numbers).
>
>
> We have some decent script improvements for 1.8 already in (PID files
> _finally_). Would be nice to clean up the rest of the scripts too
> (notably the stop scripts need some love).
>
>
> Some other back-burner thoughts: better client API metrics, more
> server-side tracing instrumentation, Adam's iterator-stack collapsing
> perf ticket, keep tabs on HDFS tracing impl, keep tabs on HTrace's GUI
> work, finish the Accumulo monitor rewrite (aka REST server + servlet3).
>
> - Josh
>
> Josh Elser wrote:
>> Thanks to the efforts spearheaded by Christopher and verified by
>> everyone else, we now have 1.5.3 and 1.6.3 releases!
>>
>> To keep the ball rolling, what's next? High level questions that come to
>> mind...
>>
>> * When do we do 1.7.1 and/or 1.8.0?
>> * What bug-fixes do we have outstanding for 1.7.1?
>> * What other minor improvements do people want for 1.8.0?
>> * Where does 2.0.0 stand? Should we make a bigger effort to getting the
>> new client API stuff Christopher had started into Apache?
>>
>> Feel free to brainstorm here and/or on JIRA (tagging relevant issues to
>> the desired fixVersion)
>>
>> - Josh

Mime
View raw message