Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 709C318BC6 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68312 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2015 16:25:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 68273 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2015 16:25:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 68261 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2015 16:25:57 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:25:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5AEECC0518 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:25:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.12 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.12 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A-XZJr7wiufU for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-f174.google.com (mail-yk0-f174.google.com [209.85.160.174]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id ADCFD20774 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ykdv136 with SMTP id v136so13817298ykd.0 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:25:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PYBHMh+0mYP6vZbgJ79Fs+hAi10XW+nmpZQt/YXmu5E=; b=M/dulB9N4oR8+3lD/fr4J3Z+wjuiloJSQd3FSWEfILuIFZZ7nX0A37WHTFVQbAA7Sz jSZFDZL5b8ws/3CVMSU1DqpMXZ88xEBXPbmk+Pl083Bh79A55lTiB+PFPSI5q7foYAla lP0mRK4OwXPTexzJ5xseKcvJjsFUndZd3C4X5pVaporKoUCQJfHRmLW70fln5uLi7Sz0 MzXiaHrmelbWjSr4B/yQuwTgq4WRCPc8lnutfqTkpwsCdbdq1P8VFrgX5BFx4nlm8W67 gN2nLX/2VCyE17ydVxLXUcem984OPTICwSESBlDQwOPStrw6PvErwxi/1Vj7ILm1rGpp Gs8g== X-Received: by 10.13.194.198 with SMTP id e189mr26255304ywd.127.1435681547693; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hw10447.local (pool-68-134-10-53.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [68.134.10.53]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z67sm41528273ywb.32.2015.06.30.09.25.46 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5592C309.2070408@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 12:25:45 -0400 From: Josh Elser User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] HDFS operation to support Accumulo locality References: <5592B824.4040509@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sean Busbey wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Josh Elser wrote: >> >>> Sorry in advance if I derail this, but I'm not sure what it would take to >>> actually implement such an operation. The initial pushback might just be >>> "use the block locations and assign the tablet yourself", since that's >>> essentially what HBase does (not suggesting there isn't something better >> to >>> do, just a hunch). >>> >>> IMO, we don't have a lot of information on locality presently. I was >>> thinking it would be nice to create a tool to help us understand locality >>> at all. >>> >> HBASE-4114 or SOLR-7458 are good things to look at here. >> >> > Also HDFS-4606 > Well then, HDFS-4606 reads very similar..