Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B013E18CC0 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 01:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51179 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2015 01:56:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 51133 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2015 01:56:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 51121 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2015 01:56:18 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 01:56:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CB16D1830BB for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 01:56:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.121 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.121 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yca6KcZkh2Ij for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 01:56:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-f170.google.com (mail-yk0-f170.google.com [209.85.160.170]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 410A5214DE for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 01:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ykdt186 with SMTP id t186so102997681ykd.0 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 18:55:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zbWNe/KsiSobzV4FFun3JJqTg/VFRFvJuWK6z8zYfdc=; b=DHmWtPdtwbn03QqP1NId1fOyDpIUWTXHQqA688gFggJnaGVCti9HkAzaO3ArML0Uz/ 7WDvCItzpsfc8D9E6OclMegmQwZIAGhuu8FG90ntofmh5yurjYc9E/VIHzEEPUvyDpXU KgT1x1ZbK9rSGsxfNWFtxJ6+Pzgz3RsgCJK8Wq9ecQY0rnqYpuBGlBxe55gRCcEzS68b HrSAmfSZHatMZQRO5m5zoQu51/WXBIDVWQ9SSnZ8kOTkenjbOUnr0JUzUpc8XGqVuCbu ByVSLIAzB8DRWDRNHTGDhXAemIOv/wqDS+2M+LImzdW0wbvBrWTCxiY+6QL1ack9X51a cwVQ== X-Received: by 10.13.246.70 with SMTP id g67mr14568244ywf.75.1435542930383; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 18:55:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hw10447.local (pool-68-134-10-53.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [68.134.10.53]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t125sm35631724ywd.55.2015.06.28.18.55.29 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 28 Jun 2015 18:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5590A58E.4080901@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 21:55:26 -0400 From: Josh Elser User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev Subject: Excessive WARN'ing from FATE ops Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Noticed this while running randomwalk against 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT. The monitor's aggregated log messages were just filled with things like the following: Failed to execute Repo, tid=76367ba00e847e10 ThriftTableOperationException(tableId:null, tableName:ctt_000, op:CREATE, type:EXISTS, description:null) at org.apache.accumulo.master.tableOps.Utils.checkTableDoesNotExist(Utils.java:54) at org.apache.accumulo.master.tableOps.PopulateZookeeper.call(PopulateZookeeper.java:54) at org.apache.accumulo.master.tableOps.PopulateZookeeper.call(PopulateZookeeper.java:30) at org.apache.accumulo.master.tableOps.TraceRepo.call(TraceRepo.java:57) at org.apache.accumulo.fate.Fate$TransactionRunner.run(Fate.java:72) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) at org.apache.accumulo.fate.util.LoggingRunnable.run(LoggingRunnable.java:35) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) Now, this is happening because of the concurrent module renaming tests, but is this really a warning that we want to propagate to the monitor? Everything is just fine and dandy in the system. Doesn't seem like it really needs to be a warning. Similarly, the following also falls into the same bucket. Cannot move tables to a new namespace by renaming. The namespace for nspc_000.ctt_002 does not match ctt_001 Thoughts before I open an issue to change them? - Josh