Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F78117CF7 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 16:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96104 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2015 16:10:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 96052 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2015 16:10:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 95817 invoked by uid 99); 15 May 2015 16:10:02 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 May 2015 16:10:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1E7E2C51FB for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 16:10:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.15 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.15 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, KAM_LOTSOFHASH=0.25, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8qeivv9u8Z4h for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 16:09:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f181.google.com (mail-qk0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E9E7222F80 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 16:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qkp63 with SMTP id 63so35953450qkp.0 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 09:09:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=soUaMcTZzlsD0CRhyPJwDrAigagSY6xc7cBCnzycJVQ=; b=PKNjgPFBlqwxpVgaWLSUhrydhKFwM9cdVyW1ikz6R3QGnyHBXncWlQl9AR1oW3RNta akIsTqa2+6Ztqvl+2ik2AVeAyzj0N+snW4/9peQ165bsSDoRNgko/+mKPfkrAUXMdduO xnrd0UuFi2hmzRLWSjyssxFmo9BceKckwRfNv0eMeTBLuHkTnS5+LPiIEBLpum/ZPkR6 iuu3+SF9SRp2OJjZu222M9K3G2Yj3R8KGykAwx0paYRJO4xHme/IYS6DBItqRRH4gu76 55FGtg++G5MiGjOn4kq4aJK8zb5/Olpff0tOa/jY/T0l622P1zOqaIv1s8vD1uBN6V16 aC5Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.27.78 with SMTP id b75mr992485qkb.7.1431706189093; Fri, 15 May 2015 09:09:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.152.131 with HTTP; Fri, 15 May 2015 09:09:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5554DD9A.8070005@gmail.com> References: <55524F9E.9060400@gmail.com> <5552548D.9020009@gmail.com> <5554DD9A.8070005@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 12:09:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3 From: Eric Newton To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147e48cd2fb2b0516211250 --001a1147e48cd2fb2b0516211250 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I've been running a RW test w/out agitation on a 21 node EC2 cluster. It died in the replication test. So I restarted it with one walker, just doing replication. Half the cluster died with zookeeper timeouts. I am investigating. I'll pull the source, build and review the results by EOB today. -Eric On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Reminder, ~27hrs remaining on this vote. 5pm ET tmrw. > > I know some people are running tests. Please pull down the source tarball, > run unit tests, build the code, poke at it locally. Any and all feedback is > warmly welcomed. The more eyes we have looking at this the better. Thanks > in advance. > > > Josh Elser wrote: > >> You are correct. I forgot to update the SHA when I copied the contents. >> >> The correct SHA1=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d >> >> Christopher wrote: >> >>> The SHA1 seems incorrect. The jars says they were built on >>> 8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d, which I can't find in the RC >>> branch. >>> >>> -- >>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser wrote: >>> >>>> Devs, >>>> >>>> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 >>>> >>>> Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 >>>> SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 >>>> Staging Repository: >>>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 >>>> >>>> >>>> Source tarball: >>>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz >>>> >>>> Binary tarball: >>>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz >>>> >>>> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an >>>> artifact.) >>>> >>>> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS >>>> >>>> 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 >>>> >>>> >>>> Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day >>>> CI w/o >>>> agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 >>>> nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. >>>> >>>> API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html >>>> >>>> >>>> API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html >>>> >>>> >>>> The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. >>>> Here's my >>>> +1. >>>> >>> --001a1147e48cd2fb2b0516211250--