Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55564E3C.20101@gmail.com>
References: <55524F9E.9060400@gmail.com>
	<55526DCD.6020605@gmail.com>
	<5552E811.2010702@gmail.com>
	<55564E3C.20101@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 16:00:06 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CADxc9BmXgUdCyAzXPj+gRdy0yvJGjPWnEaqv8wq9yxyR53KRuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3
From: Eric Newton <eric.newton@gmail.com>
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147b5646cb1610516244a73

--001a1147b5646cb1610516244a73
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Can you quantify "Some lease recoveries taking a long time in HDFS."?

I think Keith and I are ok with the release. We're looking into our
(shared) testing environment to figure out why Accumulo and HDFS are not
getting along during recoveries.

-Eric


On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:

> 72hr 3node CI verify w/ agitation just succeeded.
>
> org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts
>     REFERENCED=19706560041
>     UNREFERENCED=29844289
>
> Repeatedly ran into issues with HoldTime from HDFS (wrote a loop to just
> restart the ingester). Some lease recoveries taking a long time in HDFS.
> Nothing super impactful.
>
> I believe that wraps up all required testing.
>
>
> Josh Elser wrote:
>
>> 24hr CI just verified
>>
>> org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts
>> REFERENCED=5754999773
>> UNREFERENCED=6000227
>>
>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>
>>> 24hr RW on 3 nodes w/ agitation just finished positively.
>>>
>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI
>>>> w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation
>>>> on 3 nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation.
>>>>
>>>

--001a1147b5646cb1610516244a73--