Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D07901816C for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 17:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39142 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2015 17:45:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 39095 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2015 17:45:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 39083 invoked by uid 99); 15 May 2015 17:45:37 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 May 2015 17:45:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E770318283E for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 17:45:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.13 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.13 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, KAM_LOTSOFHASH=0.25, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CAA3_RzEquaa for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 17:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f177.google.com (mail-qc0-f177.google.com [209.85.216.177]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id CA61445419 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 17:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcvo8 with SMTP id o8so60660920qcv.0 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 10:44:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=VWqh2Ynnq3iRD1YXJbu3nB72Vh8A8citjcvgABstHv4=; b=yBLIjr/0o+AY6Rn1B7MkuFT1n/YzaY4+AxGHkdSJiq07xnCNfodnNDLfgf3fvkbFKr FtD6b3mjoqGVyAKjfPhVKGNMqm+Jmtbbo5BwTMBPPnRbazJMeKGx0JbN5ieSJnvD+/SK 5JBi8MK8TyTBJEE9tlykAouI7f/9hAAxAnKbjDhb+teZwOycCFPu0DUsjK8/Aqntu59e 8Uy+L3izJ/nOOW1qWXhxQWhJrKocvYGg3DQJuTeYAnQzpS2fiKL721fhj51mc9Vqw+NN vusjToSwCyyCQTiif+YkNwZbxCa8ac3uPyHYTqg3Khi+YrGGRwTAXvN+Gdwz5lI086OZ EsGw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.31.27 with SMTP id f27mr15749789qkf.9.1431711840359; Fri, 15 May 2015 10:44:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.152.131 with HTTP; Fri, 15 May 2015 10:44:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <55524F9E.9060400@gmail.com> <5552548D.9020009@gmail.com> <5554DD9A.8070005@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 13:44:00 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc3 From: Eric Newton To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147b564aa5ba7051622634e --001a1147b564aa5ba7051622634e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Even though I had EC2 agitating my tablet servers for me, the reason the test failed was a failed recovery due to lease recovery failure. This is the same thing Keith saw with his CI test. We did make small changes to the lease recovery code (dropped Hadoop 1 support), but I don't know why that would make a difference. The fact that we're seeing this problem in multiple tests is troubling. I'm continuing to investigate the issue. -Eric On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Eric Newton wrote: > I've been running a RW test w/out agitation on a 21 node EC2 cluster. > > It died in the replication test. > > So I restarted it with one walker, just doing replication. > > Half the cluster died with zookeeper timeouts. I am investigating. > > I'll pull the source, build and review the results by EOB today. > > -Eric > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > >> Reminder, ~27hrs remaining on this vote. 5pm ET tmrw. >> >> I know some people are running tests. Please pull down the source >> tarball, run unit tests, build the code, poke at it locally. Any and all >> feedback is warmly welcomed. The more eyes we have looking at this the >> better. Thanks in advance. >> >> >> Josh Elser wrote: >> >>> You are correct. I forgot to update the SHA when I copied the contents. >>> >>> The correct SHA1=8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d >>> >>> Christopher wrote: >>> >>>> The SHA1 seems incorrect. The jars says they were built on >>>> 8cba8128fbc3238bdd9398cf5c36b7cb6dc3b61d, which I can't find in the RC >>>> branch. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Devs, >>>>> >>>>> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 >>>>> >>>>> Tag: 1.7.0-rc3 >>>>> SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 >>>>> Staging Repository: >>>>> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Source tarball: >>>>> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz >>>>> >>>>> Binary tarball: >>>>> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1032/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz >>>>> >>>>> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an >>>>> artifact.) >>>>> >>>>> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS >>>>> >>>>> 1.7.0 includes 693 resolved issues: >>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day >>>>> CI w/o >>>>> agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 >>>>> nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. >>>>> >>>>> API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: >>>>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: >>>>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc3/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 4:00PM ET. >>>>> Here's my >>>>> +1. >>>>> >>>> > --001a1147b564aa5ba7051622634e--