Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDE5C17A7C for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 14:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69518 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2015 14:48:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 69476 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2015 14:48:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 69462 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2015 14:48:20 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 May 2015 14:48:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BE7BAC4418 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 14:48:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.121 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.121 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0QzZeM9LAvpO for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 14:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f169.google.com (mail-qc0-f169.google.com [209.85.216.169]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 4183124980 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 14:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcyk17 with SMTP id k17so5516600qcy.1 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:47:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ersTyDDOP9lyPYEg02fr9xX7JNWRUqhlVtcmsa1ZdrI=; b=vaVCaSr+Wgg4ZiRHcZZYxxo14SDqKdVUTjucfPTnPCGnALBORm86B8TE/ud2ehM+3d i8JntBVkWwrsgrsAke44xV9DE1+6NW/bkWgG6VW6KhGg7sv3llUO9W2k8GFAX6pSneMe n4Sy+I7/x5yYJ8I1jY7ngH/eTtGuLvycQSFUt8Yka4UJUgvd95gL/g6mkMnm6KU8HnS8 V+7vsmPmGVIwBisa3jis4HhAH17LToNmY3pK2tYCLRvWU9yctOuW/wu5yORApt1HKvNf FSoJcf0PEPF28E5vXDk5NV1zQoiDGbgYk1wgo1HbkludDhg+SeZNuYV15Se14/KBVjNV mHyg== X-Received: by 10.140.231.14 with SMTP id b14mr21112460qhc.85.1431442052139; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:47:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hw10447.local (pool-72-81-135-153.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [72.81.135.153]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p81sm13359669qkp.6.2015.05.12.07.47.31 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 12 May 2015 07:47:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55521282.5020902@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 10:47:30 -0400 From: Josh Elser User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.0-rc2 References: <5551894E.9020504@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Keith Turner wrote: > I noticed in the compat report that no decode method was added for > ReverseLexicoder. I am thinking this was intentional and we are ok because > its return type is generic? > > ReverseLexicoder.decode ( byte[ ] data ) *:* T Precisely, there was no parameterized method other than T (or Object more accurately) to override. > Are we ok just dropping all of the mapreduce.util stuff? Ugh, I missed these. Letter of the law, we shouldn't have dropped this stuff until 2.0. Given the intent of the collective mapreduce codebase, I think it's ok to do it though. It looks like this (also, previously confusing) issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2659 was the root cause. > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > >> Devs, >> >> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.7.0 >> >> Tag: 1.7.0-rc2 >> SHA1: 76634fb2f1257abbb8ef745ea67a4f78e733a402 >> Staging Repository: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1031/ >> >> Source tarball: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1031/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-src.tar.gz >> Binary tarball: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1031/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.7.0/accumulo-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for an >> artifact.) >> >> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS >> >> 1.7.0 includes 691 resolved issues: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12324607 >> >> Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day CI >> w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation on 3 >> nodes. Halfway through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. >> >> API compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.7.0: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc1/1.6.2_to_1.7.0/compat_report.html >> >> API backwards compatibility report for 1.7.0 to 1.6.2: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~elserj/accumulo-1.7.0-rc1/1.7.0_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html >> >> (unchanged from rc1 as no public API changes were made since rc1) Reports >> look fine to me; I believe we have source compatibility. >> >> The vote will be open for 72hrs until Friday, May 16th 1:00AM ET. Here's >> my +1. >> >