Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B610D17979 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 19:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80474 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2015 19:43:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 80426 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2015 19:43:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 80407 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2015 19:43:33 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 19:43:33 +0000 Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com (mail-ig0-f176.google.com [209.85.213.176]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 3DEB01A003F for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 19:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbqf9 with SMTP id qf9so34479831igb.1 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:43:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.42.70.18 with SMTP id d18mr1737531icj.41.1429127012687; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:43:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <552EBA4C.4040601@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <552EBA4C.4040601@gmail.com> From: John Vines Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 19:43:31 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 1.7 branch creation To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e8ad4ee34cf0513c88fc2 --90e6ba6e8ad4ee34cf0513c88fc2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I would attach cat pictures but the email aliases strips them off. Aside from that, sounds good. On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:22 PM Josh Elser wrote: > End of week? Any objections/complaints/opinions/cat-pictures? > > I'm thinking our branches would then look like > > 1.5 -> 1.5.3-SNAPSHOT > 1.6 -> 1.6.3-SNAPSHOT > 1.7 -> 1.7.0-SNAPSHOT > master -> 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT > > I think we still want to hold off on 2.0.0 because it's too amorphous > right now and w/o any concrete code ready to go into such a branch. > > - Josh > --90e6ba6e8ad4ee34cf0513c88fc2--