Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BD7E17796 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:46:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60650 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2015 17:46:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 60604 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2015 17:46:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 60235 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2015 17:46:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:46:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mdrob@mdrob.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:45:54 +0000 Received: by obcva2 with SMTP id va2so21244516obc.13 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:45:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=I1ypfm3Gqm+LRuC3x2EpPwMiDPeSBop0DXETSVn110M=; b=Ct/nQWSOv4MOc243CQSEQAC12GSHCw83dtnhmk53wLHG9clvcLO79/NlueRt1qTgt/ 56Z1G5PbWmq2Op8zR7iV0I2R3Ja+5+G8y6qP1Fde880eoppebmgPsNgCNe4H/K8GfMTc YIdwUcG17rpSXpKRIRCZ0riSgOXRBFceupRULWg932gLTjdWUA7gefWZ12RwhwOVS7oj VGyHUtb9YY3HABJWx3+w3OmKIGOyXAevL0HlC3wfm8OcK+I27BGNLjauq5DISnaNTErt cNLLLhI+EDscz49gikQYEJbceD+2WQA/XK7yDSFGaAyEOtHDooSnzaP7NmMAkXPghwgg ECsg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlCMYhdE3n6sUR35sWBF6zHKK20qCWaRdrzSPsgGS3ep3aeMcAUYupPXXx+0W6SCixfogdc MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.155.135 with SMTP id vw7mr7930439oeb.62.1426268706978; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.42.133 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:45:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [206.174.249.181] In-Reply-To: References: <55031D37.7040506@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:45:06 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: More jenkins results From: Mike Drob To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd76720a2500805112f0f74 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bd76720a2500805112f0f74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I think it's valuable to see the failure notifications even without being able to make changes. I know that I generally ignore the ASF Jenkins at this point because it is (was?) too underpowered. On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Christopher wrote: > That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the test > results and/or configure the jobs. > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own. I've > been > > running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's been > > really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to run > > through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on it), > > but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests are > > runnable by anyone. > > > > If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up emails to > be > > sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of just to > > myself. > > > > Thoughts/Opinions? > --047d7bd76720a2500805112f0f74--