Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of busbey@cloudera.com designates
 209.85.216.178 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55034E81.6060106@gmail.com>
References: <55031D37.7040506@gmail.com>
 <CAL5zq9ZiUqm5VO=VF+J33+4u7ERhYcErHgLOUeyd35MSEpWsMA@mail.gmail.com>
 <55032704.2070307@gmail.com> <550332F1.5040802@gmail.com>
 <CAL5zq9ZeRgz3nmrN9dQZpu-dO_9pRisYNKf52qKrf92zCrRtHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <55033B30.9050007@gmail.com>
 <CAL5zq9YxYN9GLikdx-XVjT6SP1ZQz6rCueweb3nLW0A7weEQ9g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJRvFdobHk9diHi8p=U=4stvYDjaC142N+4EszboqiervdaeYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <55034E81.6060106@gmail.com>
From: Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:05:14 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAGHyZ6JvX8XtMjzM7FjaqmkU5B4aVzZGpvAzLpYP0NuHysUMoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: More jenkins results
To: "dev@accumulo apache. org" <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1137629489ddb4051131dc54

--001a1137629489ddb4051131dc54
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

+1 Thanks for doing this Josh.

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things down
> to a specific set of jobs.
>
> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT jobs
> from apache jenkins.
>
>
> Mike Drob wrote:
>
>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm not
>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and
>> sending an email.
>>
>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns?
>>
>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime. A
>> real
>> mensch!
>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ctubbsii@apache.org>  wrote:
>>
>>  I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be
>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some
>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>>
>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right now.
>>>>
>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control over
>>>>
>>> a
>>>
>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to the
>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
>>>>
>>> responsive --
>>>
>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to call
>>>> me
>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think I've
>>>>
>>> been
>>>
>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>>
>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at these
>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
>>>> /dev/null,
>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
>>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just speculating
>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would want
>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the email
>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>>
>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions would
>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-
>>> Integration-Tests/325/
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-
>>> Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>
>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as
>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be
>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that was
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> run.
>>>
>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do you
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> think
>>>
>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the
>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own.
>>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> been
>>>
>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> run
>>>
>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on
>>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests
>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> emails
>>>
>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of just
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> to
>>>
>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>


-- 
Sean

--001a1137629489ddb4051131dc54--