Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of josh.elser@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.179 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <55033B30.9050007@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:32:00 -0400
From: Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: More jenkins results
References: <55031D37.7040506@gmail.com>
 <CAL5zq9ZiUqm5VO=VF+J33+4u7ERhYcErHgLOUeyd35MSEpWsMA@mail.gmail.com>
 <55032704.2070307@gmail.com> <550332F1.5040802@gmail.com>
 <CAL5zq9ZeRgz3nmrN9dQZpu-dO_9pRisYNKf52qKrf92zCrRtHg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAL5zq9ZeRgz3nmrN9dQZpu-dO_9pRisYNKf52qKrf92zCrRtHg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right now.

I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control over 
a system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to the 
project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be 
responsive -- and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than 
welcome to call me out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I 
don't think I've been given WRT Accumulo.

IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at these 
results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to 
/dev/null, it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I 
find time.

Christopher wrote:
> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
> certificate store for my system).
>
> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just speculating
> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would want
> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the email
> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>
> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions would
> still be added value on its own, though.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>
>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>
>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>
>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as trusted
>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be trusted
>> by default in FF.
>>
>>
>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that was run.
>>>
>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do you think
>>> you would need to configure?
>>>
>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the test
>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own.
>>>>> I've been
>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's been
>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to run
>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on
>>>>> it),
>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests are
>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>
>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up emails
>>>>> to be
>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of just to
>>>>> myself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?