accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
Subject Re: More jenkins results
Date Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:26:34 GMT
I'm not a fan of putting it on the dev@ list. There must be a way to
add the email to a whitelist. Or... can you configure Jenkins to just
send as your from address as elserj-builds@apache.org?

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii


On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've lost
> interest in trying to make it work any further.
>
> Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list (dev@a.a.o)
> instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use filters of some
> form to move things around anyways.
>
> LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it would
> increase the traffic here dramatically.
>
>
> Josh Elser wrote:
>>
>> Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get
>> ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed through
>> normal means).
>>
>> We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this week.
>> Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually.
>>
>> Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test failures
>> on master!
>>
>> (big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers)
>>
>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>
>>> Frak.
>>>
>>> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send from
>>> my server...
>>>
>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before <enter> was hit.
>>>>
>>>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the Accumulo
>>>> jobs and I can add an account for you.
>>>>
>>>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials since
>>>> you brought up this discussion.
>>>>
>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things
>>>>> down to a specific set of jobs.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
>>>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT
>>>>> jobs from apache jenkins.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and
I'm
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing
and
>>>>>> sending an email.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime.
A
>>>>>> real
>>>>>> mensch!
>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ctubbsii@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd
be
>>>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>>>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have
some
>>>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;)
]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results
right
>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external
control
>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service
to
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't
be
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> responsive --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome
to
>>>>>>>> call me
>>>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't
think
>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking
at
>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going
to
>>>>>>>> /dev/null,
>>>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as
I find
>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my
shared NSS
>>>>>>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure...
just
>>>>>>>>> speculating
>>>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least,
I would
>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify
the
>>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration
permissions
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom
SSL certs as
>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page),
but it should be
>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for
the last job that
>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> run.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but
what exactly do
>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log
on to it to view the
>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins
instance on a VPS I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> own.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly
for some time now and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It
has just enough
>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really
heavy-handed tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline
for ensuring the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value
from it, I can set up
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org
list instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>

Mime
View raw message