Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B36410889 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 05:40:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43653 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2015 05:40:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 43608 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2015 05:40:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 43596 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2015 05:40:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 05:40:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cjnolet@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.177] (HELO mail-ie0-f177.google.com) (209.85.223.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 05:39:46 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id vy18so7738118iec.8 for ; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 21:39:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=/kbKJme4jJWWdqpWqnOLSTWmNDeKE0kJXJjY9NlWPLo=; b=zy5tKeLWUwWKfdLE9WOVK5CoqG5S7nnTGcuhvv7WXmE9nr8lGh4DpHp7nfreWtIudM mPsHzGWMjJZcCNQeRbjagRITcsdWXiIcHK/3UHf5f79NiuWXm4hzJ3d2YjdT1ZrrBbdv CFAF+GKdm0loX+wWBsIk3zttZ4Pn8e7BqMthjU7qEorJuGwzVXvi6hhD3QaFk6YMX0En OnuaQiIPltMHHQRDve740KizSRT+wgjZa2D9OEEs2N/8WcR1nLHs4Gw4OECfAio//jOH Cp0Gp0573sMoO6EPR+v8Hwk2NrzmEA7x5HtMX9/k0zpytOP9Vhiz8LIDwDf3Y/90YJmj TCDw== X-Received: by 10.50.109.228 with SMTP id hv4mr28818255igb.45.1423114783478; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 21:39:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.232.146 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 21:39:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <54CABC32.6010209@gmail.com> From: Corey Nolet Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 00:39:23 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3 To: "dev@accumulo.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a214e24f21b050e50bb35 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e013a214e24f21b050e50bb35 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I have RC4 staged and ready. I'll hold off until tonight (Thursday) to fire off the vote to give the community time to verify recent changes in the 1.6.1 branch. On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Eric Newton wrote: > -0 > > It would be nice to have ACCUMULO-3547 > in 1.6.2. > > We are running at scale with it at the moment, and it has made a huge > improvement. I hate to hold up 1.6.2, though. If it doesn't make it, > please update the ticket to point to 1.6.3. > > Corey, thanks for all your effort. > > -Eric > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Keith Turner wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Corey Nolet wrote: > > > > > > However I am seeing ACCUMULO-3545[1] that > > > I need to investigate. > > > > > > Ok. I'll cut another RC as soon as that's complete. > > > > > > > Verification completed. Successfully wrote and verified 31B entries on > a > > 20 nodes EC2 cluster. Used Hadoop 2.6.0, ZK 3.4.5, Centos 6, and > openjdk > > 7. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Josh Elser > > wrote: > > > > > > > Given the stuff Keith found already, I'm -1, but I did take some time > > > this > > > > RC to rerun some tests. I had one IT that failed on me from the > source > > > > build which we can fix later -- things are looking good otherwise > from > > my > > > > testing. > > > > > > > > Thanks for working through this Corey, and Keith for finding bugs :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Corey Nolet wrote: > > > > > > > >> Devs, > > > >> > > > >> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo > 1.6.2 > > > >> > > > >> Branch: 1.6.2-rc3 > > > >> SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf > > > >> Staging Repository: > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/ > > > >> > > > >> Source tarball: > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6. > > > >> 2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz > > > >> Binary tarball: > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6. > > > >> 2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz > > > >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the > signature/hash > > > for > > > >> a > > > >> given artifact.) > > > >> > > > >> Signing keys available at: > > > https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > > > >> > > > >> Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved: > > > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= > > > >> blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3 > > > >> > > > >> Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are > passing. > > > >> > > > >> API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2: > > > >> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/ > > > >> compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html > > > >> > > > >> API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1: > > > >> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/ > > > >> compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html > > > >> > > > >> The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC > > > (1/30 > > > >> 8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT) > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > --089e013a214e24f21b050e50bb35--