accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Current master branch version
Date Mon, 16 Feb 2015 22:47:05 GMT
Sean Busbey wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2015 10:40 AM, "Josh Elser"<josh.elser@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> I'm failing to actually parse this WRT what we're allowed to do, but
> would naturally lean towards keeping 1.7.0. I don't think anything else has
> changed which would make us not want to tie 2.0 to a new client API.
>
> Since 1.6.z ->  1.7.0 is a minor version bump, we can add to the public API
> so long as the changes are binary backward compatible.
>
> That means new classes, interfaces,methods, enum members, etc are all fine.
> All of the things labelled as HIGH severity in the binary compatibility
> report are definitely a problem. They're mostly classes and methods that
> were removed.

Thank you, this is what I was struggling to understand.

> The end goal should be a report like the one Corey got for 1.6.1 ->  1.6.2.
> We don't need the reciprocal report to be compatible because minor versions
> need not be forward compatible.
>
> Problems in the source compatibility report are worth reviewing, but things
> that only show up there shouldn't be a blocker.
>

Mime
View raw message