accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Growing project involvement
Date Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:59:05 GMT
Thanks Jeremy, those are good points!

Any suggestions on how/where to best emphasize this? 
Blogs/social-media/mailing lists? Something more?

Jeremy Kepner wrote:
> A few additional comments:
>
> (1) How can attract good contributors.  1-2 "ace" contributors can really carry an open-source
project on their back.
> - Perhaps emphasize Accumulo's world class capabilites: performance, scalability, security.
>
> (2) How can we attact good users with money. Good users will be able to use the software
> well and get good results.  If they have money they will be able to support the community.
> - Perhaps emphasize that Accumulo is suitable for the largest workloads at the largest
institutions.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 09:51:33PM -0500, Josh Elser wrote:
>> Some anonymous feedback (sent with love):
>>
>> <quote>
>> It's important that we understand the reason for trying to get new
>> people involved with the project. The way to really grow the
>> project's adoption is by increasing user interest in the product and
>> its relevance in the community. Adding new people to the project
>> isn't a direct solution to that problem. Right now, I'd say that the
>> project lacks both, but this isn't really abnormal for what is a
>> niche product.
>> <quote>
>>
>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>> I meant to send this out closer to the new year (to ride on the new year
>>> resolution stereotype), but I slacked. Forgive me.
>>>
>>> As should be aware by those paying attention, we have had very little
>>> growth within the project over the past 6-9 months. We've had our normal
>>> spattering of contributions, a few from some repeat people, but I don't
>>> think we've grown as much as we could.
>>>
>>> I wanted to see if anyone has any suggestions on what we could try to do
>>> better in the coming year to help more people get involved with the
>>> project. I don't want this to turn into a "we do X wrong" discussion, so
>>> please try to stay positive and include suggestion(s) for every problem
>>> presented when possible.
>>>
>>> Also, everyone should feel welcome to participate in the discussion
>>> here. If you fall into the "bucket" described, I'd love to hear from
>>> you. If anyone doesn't want to publicly respond, please feel free to
>>> email me privately and I'll anonymously post to the list on your behalf.
>>>
>>> Some ideas to start off discussion:
>>>
>>> * Help reduce barrier to entry for new developers
>>> - Ensure imple/easy-to-process instructions for getting and building
>>> code in common environments
>>> - Instructions on running tests and reporting issues
>>>
>>> * More high-level examples
>>> - Maybe we start too deep in distributed-systems land and we scare away
>>> devs who think they "don't know enough to help"
>>> - Recording "newbie" tickets and providing adequate information for
>>> anyone to come along and try to take it on
>>> - Encourage/help/promote "concrete" ideas/code in the project. Something
>>> that is more tangible for devs to wrap their head around (also can help
>>> with adoption from new users)
>>>
>>> * Better documentation and "marketing"
>>> - We do "ok" with the occasional blog post, and the user manual is
>>> usually thorough, but we can obviously do better.
>>> - Can we create more "literature" to encourage more users and devs to
>>> get involved, trying to lower the barrier to entry?
>>>
>>> Thanks all.

Mime
View raw message