accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Drew Farris <drew.far...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Updated Accumulo Benchmarking Paper
Date Sun, 23 Nov 2014 14:32:36 GMT
Yes, I can't claim this version is peer reviewed. A second link is like a
great idea. I'll get the change up on staging.

Thanks for the feedback.

On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com> wrote:

> I think it's worth maintaining a pointer to the peer reviewed version.
>
> How about leave the current link with the IEEE and peer reviewed bits, then
> add a follow on entry that bears teh note "updated to include foo" that
> does not have the peer-reviewed marker?
>
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Jeremy Kepner <kepner@ll.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> > So the only question would be how you would fill out the "Peer-Reviewed"
> > column.
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 05:46:47PM -0500, Drew Farris wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > There is an updated version of the paper "Benchmarking Apache Accumulo
> > > BigData Distributed Table Store Using Its Continuous Test Suite" that's
> > > currently linked in the papers section of the Accumulo website.
> > >
> > > Would anyone object to me updating the link? I believe I have the
> > necessary
> > > karma to do so, but was reluctant to do so without first informing the
> > > community of my intent..
> > >
> > > This version has been edited for clarity, structure and includes
> results
> > > from running the tests described on the paper on Amazon EC2. It no
> longer
> > > bears the IEEE Big Data mark.
> > >
> > > The new link is http://sqrrl.com/media/accumulo-benchmarking-2.1.pdf
> > >
> > > Drew
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sean
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message