accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sean Busbey <>
Subject Re: ACCUMULO-3177 and ACCUMULO-3178
Date Wed, 26 Nov 2014 16:30:20 GMT
I will follow up on both of those tickets with my objections, please do not
apply them.

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Christopher <> wrote:

> My intention is to, sometime this week, take a thorough look at the patches
> and reviews available for ACCUMULO-3177 (create a per-table VolumeChooser)
> and ACCUMULO-3178 (example implementation of an alternate
> VolumeChooser/test case for ACCUMULO-3177). Given the discussions
> surrounding ACCUMULO-3176, and because they originated as the overall
> ACCUMULO-3089 (which had some objections that may not have been resolved) I
> wanted to give this notice, to ensure that there is opportunity for
> objections to occur and be discussed here first.
> Presumably, the objections for ACCUMULO-3176 are different from any that
> might be held for 3177 and 3178, but there was limited follow-up
> clarification of the objections raised after the issues were re-scoped as
> separate, more specific, JIRA sub-tasks. So, I'm not sure there are any
> still outstanding for those. Since the reviews are still open for those, I
> just wanted to invite discussion either here, or (perhaps even better) in
> the specific review in ReviewBoard.
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message