accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Drob <mad...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] ACCUMULO-3176
Date Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:28:22 GMT
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3089 for those of us who
need it.

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:

> Committers, this is a consensus vote on whether or not to include Jenna's
> patch for ACCUMULO-3176 to the 1.7.0-SNAPSHOT (master) branch.
>
> This patch improves the table creation API with the introduction of a
> NewTableConfiguration object (similar to the pattern for
> BatchWriterConfig), which allows us to be flexible on improving table
> creation options in the future without creating many overloaded methods (as
> the table creation API has been plagued by in the past). The main goal of
> the patch is to allow table properties to be set on a table at the time of
> creation, before any tablets are assigned, but it also lays the foundation
> for future table creation improvements. Creating initial table properties
> was already present in the RPC calls, but not exposed in the API. This can
> support a number of use cases.
>
> Since an objection was raised by Sean Busbey (and a veto expected), I've
> initiated this vote in lieu of applying the patch under lazy consensus so
> that any veto votes can be justified and addressed here.
>
> Note: there are a few bugs in the Mock implementation of this that I've
> fixed, as well as some minor deprecation warnings and javadoc improvements
> I'm adding, please apply your vote under the assumption that those will be
> fixed before it will be applied.
>
> Please vote in accordance with the bylaws for consensus voting.
> My vote is +1.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message