accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ke...@deenlo.com
Subject Re: Review Request 27654: Add introspection of long running assignments
Date Thu, 06 Nov 2014 18:18:15 GMT


> On Nov. 6, 2014, 5:47 p.m., kturner wrote:
> > server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/TabletServerResourceManager.java,
line 250
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27654/diff/3/?file=751140#file751140line250>
> >
> >     The compaction code remembers when it logged an exception and does not do it
again.   It also logs a message if the compaction becomes unstuck.  An advantage I thought
of w/ repeatedly logging, is that you could see the stack trace changing (or not).
> >     
> >     
> >     The stack trace is  a possible trace.  By the time logging happens, the assignment
could have completed and the thread could have moved on to other things.
> 
> Josh Elser wrote:
>     Yeah, since these are running fairly regularly (order of seconds) a stuck assignment
could get really spammy. Like you point out, there could be value gained from printing out
the stack more than once. Maybe I could add some backoff which only warns so often?
>     
>     bq. By the time logging happens, the assignment could have completed and the thread
could have moved on to other things.
>     
>     Do you think the message should be updated to be more clear about this? A "Maybe
you should look into this" type message?

> a stuck assignment could get really spammy

I think that spam is probably ok as long as the default is high enough such that when it does
happen, its something to be concerned about.  Could make the timer check a little less frequently.

> Do you think the message should be updated to be more clear about this?

I think compaction code just says its a possible stack trace.   I suppose a good solution
would be to have error codes, then user can look up error code and get nitty gritty details.
 Can't really put too much info in log message.


- kturner


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27654/#review60185
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 6, 2014, 12:58 a.m., Josh Elser wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/27654/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 6, 2014, 12:58 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for accumulo.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ACCUMULO-3304
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3304
> 
> 
> Repository: accumulo
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Watches assignments and reports when an assignment is running for longer than a configured
time.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/conf/Property.java 56f3d9c 
>   server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/ActiveAssignmentRunnable.java
PRE-CREATION 
>   server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/RunnableStartedAt.java PRE-CREATION

>   server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/TabletServer.java 94be0bb

>   server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/TabletServerResourceManager.java
935ffeb 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27654/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Very minimal.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Josh Elser
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message