Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FE8D115B3 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96975 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2014 14:00:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 96937 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2014 14:00:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 96843 invoked by uid 99); 24 Sep 2014 14:00:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:00:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of busbey@cloudera.com designates 209.85.216.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.44] (HELO mail-qa0-f44.google.com) (209.85.216.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:00:28 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id x12so3258949qac.3 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 07:00:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=igzFnwFlH7p5ovrFtsVk2WlMHtHyim1c1k2+UhW6iiY=; b=ZMmpYCBFMQuadKSeT3tIrJ2gnbIRPF43e1Zs+sG+ZKQTi0B5wg7iOZYFh5AkO5yS24 WOt7pmCztmeF5GHIM0nMIIFdAKNWCtpr4hmE+DubvVRFg6QVEW6XZoVyqFT6XF5sB3J1 OWhZ5RcN8ofyOP9zjhBoiwuHfFw8A/22jz9NRYvnpFyaLPozboHVnIeJJeav/qx85Ewk 1FK6iJzrc2yijnSU7XOrb8QCMlc0jcZlgK+t/pgVP52E7UZAFk5TH1q6oOvaI/ZBHSYW c6VzGInkflhMuOY40LUhA2MtJI9PednN+rHnjDBBrqY/Zl8jh0/kkpUgMkCf0UAh/ijq eVJg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkzraqJQKWvTAfxMNBjFEtoaIsuNwZXHYEROdT81Y9CM0uHh3KY35KjunNkVgFc6qISx1g6 X-Received: by 10.224.51.197 with SMTP id e5mr9281367qag.48.1411567207526; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 07:00:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.104.136 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:59:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Sean Busbey Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:59:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.1 RC1 To: "dev@accumulo apache. org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2d35efb4d190503d019db X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c2d35efb4d190503d019db Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Josh, how big are all the logs? On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Well, color me shocked -- the verify found some bad data. It looks > like two keys have bad checksums (which I assume is what created the > UNDEFINEDs, too?). > > CORRUPT 2 > REFERENCED 2199999908 > UNDEFINED 2 > UNREFERENCED 874770 > > I ran two tabletservers on my desktop, turned on hflush instead of > hsync, switched from GZ to snappy and upped the splits threshold for > 4g and let CI run for ~5 hours. I killed the tservers about a dozen > times by hand throughout the day (kill -9), and the master once or > twice. The datanode was left alone. This was running on 2.6.0-SNAPSHOT > from around 9/14/2014. > > The offending keys are: > > 389a85668b6ebf8e 2ff6:4a78 [] 1411499115242 > > 3a10885b-d481-4d00-be00-0477e231ey65:000000008576b169:0cd98965c9ccc1d0:ba15529e > > and > > 7e56b58a0c7df128 5fa0:6249 [] 1411499311578 > > 3a10885b-d481-4d00-be00-0477e231e965:0000p000872d60eb:499fa72752d82a7c:5c5f19e8 > > which both happened a little after 3:00pm eastern (I stopped CI around > 3:30pm eastern). I don't see anything immediately wrong in the tserver > logs (nor does it appear that I had restarted either of them around > the timestamp of the above keys). I see no errors in the DN logs > either around that time window. > > I don't have a clue how to even start looking at this to figure out if > something indeed went wrong, or if it's some other sort of issue. To > be clear, this as it stands isn't sufficient to make me change my > vote. > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > +1 > > > > * Verified checksums+sigs > > * Build from source tarball and ran all unit+functional tests against > > Apache Hadoop 2.5.1 and 2.6.0-SNAPSHOT > > * Ingested 2B records w/ CI + clean verify with single tserver (Apache > > Hadoop 2.6.0-SNAPSHOT + Apache ZooKeeper 3.4.5) > > * Ingested ~2.5B records w/ CI with 2 tservers and some manual > > agitation (Apache Hadoop 2.6.0-SNAPSHOT + Apache ZooKeeper 3.4.5) > > - Currently running verify, will report if I get a failed verify > > * Ran some Hive queries (w/ Apache Hive-0.14.0-SNAPSHOT & Apache Tez > > 0.6.0-SNAPSHOT) > > * Ran some Pig queries (w/ Apache Pig-0.13.0) > > > > Thanks for organizing this, Corey!! > > > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Corey Nolet wrote: > >> Devs, > >> > >> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.1 > >> > >> Branch: 1.6.1-rc1 > >> SHA1: 88c5473b3b49d797d3dabebd12fe517e9b248ba2 > >> Staging Repository: > >> * > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1017/ > >> < > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1017/ > >* > >> > >> Source tarball: > >> * > http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1017/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.1/accumulo-1.6.1-src.tar.gz > >> < > http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1017/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.1/accumulo-1.6.1-src.tar.gz > >* > >> Binary tarball: > >> * > http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1017/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.1/accumulo-1.6.1-bin.tar.gz > >> < > http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1017/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.1/accumulo-1.6.1-bin.tar.gz > >* > >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a > >> given artifact.) > >> > >> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > >> > >> Over 1.6.1, we have 188 issues resolved > >> * > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES;h=91b9d31e3b9dc53f1a576cc49bbc061919eb0070;hb=1.6.1-rc1 > >> < > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES;h=91b9d31e3b9dc53f1a576cc49bbc061919eb0070;hb=1.6.1-rc1 > >* > >> > >> Testing: All unit and functional tests are passing. > >> > >> Vote will be open until Thursday, September 25th 12:00AM UTC (9/24 > 8:00PM > >> ET, 9/24 5:00PM PT) > -- Sean --001a11c2d35efb4d190503d019db--