Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8015C11BD1 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 05:16:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37993 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2014 05:16:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 37952 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2014 05:16:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 37939 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2014 05:16:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 05:16:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of josh.elser@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.47] (HELO mail-qg0-f47.google.com) (209.85.192.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 05:16:24 +0000 Received: by mail-qg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id q107so1323465qgd.6 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:16:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XqwkUCF7BZZWy0puc0ccE0Gg0mJ5UL7QaHGw/MYJJvE=; b=uhnH3CLyJEdqSS1aGyehTCLSRr1XN/wyYEB4MsL1e7jQZYldF4Rg7mBJxMgnWwfqYK yz8FEtcFieYaU0FJ9upF0WQCAS4Bw2LmAAQiBXsi4ZbDg3oPE/QAJbOawtg5vjCK0uJG iAdeHxCzazi5A6wR2J9K+yY5fCAhwBX/TfxbPMvBbK5Gpx+KeRh+xIFok/L23J5wBaR5 Tw5LSKaf8doIaeQZvvKxIOxMnvosnyMZC9Dt1ZGmJhGHZD/Ly/OMQOU1tlVWwYH+5SAq 2yBrBaVgr0/8lL9qN2LYYXaYi3i4BfZpVSjHPjuD9Y6Ts/MgWGTYTzhObuQOmm5+2Fpd hxIw== X-Received: by 10.224.74.67 with SMTP id t3mr41628qaj.100.1411103783120; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HW10447.local (pool-71-166-48-47.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [71.166.48.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 11sm766879qgp.2.2014.09.18.22.16.22 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <541BBC25.7090105@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 01:16:21 -0400 From: Josh Elser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1 References: <541712A2.30204@gmail.com> <541B9305.7030506@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org No we did not bundle any release announcements prior. I also have to agree with Bill -- I don't really see how there would be confusion with a properly worded announcement. Happy to work with anyone who has concerns in this regard to come up with something that is agreeable. I do think they should be separate. On 9/19/14, 1:02 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > Did we bundle 1.5.1/1.6.0? If not, they were fairly close together, I > think. Historically, we have not done a great job of distinguishing our > release lines, so that has led to confusion. Maybe I'm on the path to > talking myself out of a combined announcement here. > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:57 PM, William Slacum < > wilhelm.von.cloud@accumulo.net> wrote: > >> Not to be a total jerk, but what's unclear about 1.5 < 1.6? Lots of >> projects have multiple release lines and it's not an issue. >> >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Mike Drob wrote: >> >>> +1 to combining. I've already had questions about upgrading to "this >> latest >>> release" from somebody currently on the 1.6 line. Our release narrative >> is >>> not clear and we should not muddle the waters. >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Christopher >> wrote: >>> >>>> Should we wait to do a release announcement until 1.6.1, so we can >> batch >>>> the two? >>>> >>>> My main concern here is that I don't want to encourage new 1.5.x >> adoption >>>> when we have 1.6.x, and having two announcements could be confusing to >>> new >>>> users who aren't sure which version to start using. We could issue an >>>> announcement that primarily mentions 1.6.1, and also mentions 1.5.2 >>> second. >>>> That way, people will see 1.6.x as the stable/focus release, but will >>> still >>>> inform 1.5.x users of updates. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Josh Elser >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Vote passes with 3 +1's and nothing else. Huge thank you to those who >>>> made >>>>> the time to participate. >>>>> >>>>> I'll finish up the rest of the release work tonight. >>>>> >>>>> On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Devs, >>>>>> >>>>>> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 >>>>>> >>>>>> Tag: 1.5.2rc1 >>>>>> SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c >>>>>> Staging Repository: >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>>>> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Source tarball: >>>>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>>>> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. >>>>>> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz >>>>>> >>>>>> Binary tarball: >>>>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>>>> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. >>>>>> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz >>>>>> >>>>>> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash >> for a >>>>>> given artifact.) >>>>>> >>>>>> Signing keys available at: >> https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS >>>>>> >>>>>> Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved >>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= >>>>>> blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= >>>>>> 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B >>>>>> entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. >>>>>> >>>>>> Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM >>> ET, >>>>>> 8/18 5:00PM PT) >>>>>> >>>>>> - Josh >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >