accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
Date Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:44:53 GMT
I agree w/ Bill and Corey.  I don't think there is anything confusing about
1.5 < 1.6.  Also if someone thinks of something that is confusing, we can
document that on the website in release notes and/or on download page.  I
think its ok to make the 1.5.2 announcement independently from 1.6.1.


On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Corey Nolet <cjnolet@gmail.com> wrote:

> If we are concerned with confusion about adoption of new versions, we
> should make a point to articulate the purpose very clearly in each of the
> announcements. I was in the combined camp an hour ago and now I'm also
> thinking we should keep them separate.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > No we did not bundle any release announcements prior. I also have to
> agree
> > with Bill -- I don't really see how there would be confusion with a
> > properly worded announcement.
> >
> > Happy to work with anyone who has concerns in this regard to come up with
> > something that is agreeable. I do think they should be separate.
> >
> >
> > On 9/19/14, 1:02 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
> >
> >> Did we bundle 1.5.1/1.6.0? If not, they were fairly close together, I
> >> think. Historically, we have not done a great job of distinguishing our
> >> release lines, so that has led to confusion. Maybe I'm on the path to
> >> talking myself out of a combined announcement here.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:57 PM, William Slacum <
> >> wilhelm.von.cloud@accumulo.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>  Not to be a total jerk, but what's unclear about 1.5 < 1.6? Lots of
> >>> projects have multiple release lines and it's not an issue.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Mike Drob <madrob@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  +1 to combining. I've already had questions about upgrading to "this
> >>>>
> >>> latest
> >>>
> >>>> release" from somebody currently on the 1.6 line. Our release
> narrative
> >>>>
> >>> is
> >>>
> >>>> not clear and we should not muddle the waters.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org>
> >>>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>  Should we wait to do a release announcement until 1.6.1, so we can
> >>>>>
> >>>> batch
> >>>
> >>>> the two?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My main concern here is that I don't want to encourage new 1.5.x
> >>>>>
> >>>> adoption
> >>>
> >>>> when we have 1.6.x, and having two announcements could be confusing
to
> >>>>>
> >>>> new
> >>>>
> >>>>> users who aren't sure which version to start using. We could issue
an
> >>>>> announcement that primarily mentions 1.6.1, and also mentions 1.5.2
> >>>>>
> >>>> second.
> >>>>
> >>>>> That way, people will see 1.6.x as the stable/focus release, but
will
> >>>>>
> >>>> still
> >>>>
> >>>>> inform 1.5.x users of updates.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
> >>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Vote passes with 3 +1's and nothing else. Huge thank you to those
> who
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> made
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> the time to participate.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'll finish up the rest of the release work tonight.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>  Devs,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo
1.5.2
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Tag: 1.5.2rc1
> >>>>>>> SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c
> >>>>>>> Staging Repository:
> >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>>>>>> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Source tarball:
> >>>>>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>>>>>> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5.
> >>>>>>> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Binary tarball:
> >>>>>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>>>>>> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5.
> >>>>>>> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> for a
> >>>
> >>>> given artifact.)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signing keys available at:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved
> >>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=
> >>>>>>> blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb=
> >>>>>>> 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested
1B
> >>>>>>> entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC
(8/18
> 8:00PM
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> ET,
> >>>>
> >>>>> 8/18 5:00PM PT)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> - Josh
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message