accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.1 RC1
Date Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:04:49 GMT
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Russ Weeks <rweeks@newbrightidea.com>
wrote:

> Interesting that "y" (0x79) and "9" (0x39) are one bit "away" from each
> other. I blame cosmic rays!
>

It is interesting, and thats only half of the story.  Its been interesting
chatting w/ Josh about this on irc and hearing about his findings.


>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >>> The offending keys are:
> >>>
> >>> 389a85668b6ebf8e 2ff6:4a78 [] 1411499115242
> >>>
> >>> 3a10885b-d481-4d00-be00-0477e231ey65:000000008576b169:
> >>> 0cd98965c9ccc1d0:ba15529e
> >>>
> >>
> > The careful eye will notice that the UUID in the first component of the
> > value has a different suffix than the next corrupt key/value (ends with
> > "ey65" instead of "e965"). Fixing this in the Value and re-running the
> CRC
> > makes it pass.
> >
> >
> >  and
> >>>
> >>> 7e56b58a0c7df128 5fa0:6249 [] 1411499311578
> >>>
> >>> 3a10885b-d481-4d00-be00-0477e231e965:0000p000872d60eb:
> >>> 499fa72752d82a7c:5c5f19e8
> >>>
> >>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message