accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Drob <mad...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.1 RC1
Date Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:13:31 GMT
Any chance the IRC chats can make it only the ML for posterity?

Mike

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Russ Weeks <rweeks@newbrightidea.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Interesting that "y" (0x79) and "9" (0x39) are one bit "away" from each
> > other. I blame cosmic rays!
> >
>
> It is interesting, and thats only half of the story.  Its been interesting
> chatting w/ Josh about this on irc and hearing about his findings.
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >>> The offending keys are:
> > >>>
> > >>> 389a85668b6ebf8e 2ff6:4a78 [] 1411499115242
> > >>>
> > >>> 3a10885b-d481-4d00-be00-0477e231ey65:000000008576b169:
> > >>> 0cd98965c9ccc1d0:ba15529e
> > >>>
> > >>
> > > The careful eye will notice that the UUID in the first component of the
> > > value has a different suffix than the next corrupt key/value (ends with
> > > "ey65" instead of "e965"). Fixing this in the Value and re-running the
> > CRC
> > > makes it pass.
> > >
> > >
> > >  and
> > >>>
> > >>> 7e56b58a0c7df128 5fa0:6249 [] 1411499311578
> > >>>
> > >>> 3a10885b-d481-4d00-be00-0477e231e965:0000p000872d60eb:
> > >>> 499fa72752d82a7c:5c5f19e8
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message