accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
Date Fri, 19 Sep 2014 05:16:21 GMT
No we did not bundle any release announcements prior. I also have to 
agree with Bill -- I don't really see how there would be confusion with 
a properly worded announcement.

Happy to work with anyone who has concerns in this regard to come up 
with something that is agreeable. I do think they should be separate.

On 9/19/14, 1:02 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
> Did we bundle 1.5.1/1.6.0? If not, they were fairly close together, I
> think. Historically, we have not done a great job of distinguishing our
> release lines, so that has led to confusion. Maybe I'm on the path to
> talking myself out of a combined announcement here.
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:57 PM, William Slacum <
> wilhelm.von.cloud@accumulo.net> wrote:
>
>> Not to be a total jerk, but what's unclear about 1.5 < 1.6? Lots of
>> projects have multiple release lines and it's not an issue.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Mike Drob <madrob@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 to combining. I've already had questions about upgrading to "this
>> latest
>>> release" from somebody currently on the 1.6 line. Our release narrative
>> is
>>> not clear and we should not muddle the waters.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Should we wait to do a release announcement until 1.6.1, so we can
>> batch
>>>> the two?
>>>>
>>>> My main concern here is that I don't want to encourage new 1.5.x
>> adoption
>>>> when we have 1.6.x, and having two announcements could be confusing to
>>> new
>>>> users who aren't sure which version to start using. We could issue an
>>>> announcement that primarily mentions 1.6.1, and also mentions 1.5.2
>>> second.
>>>> That way, people will see 1.6.x as the stable/focus release, but will
>>> still
>>>> inform 1.5.x users of updates.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Vote passes with 3 +1's and nothing else. Huge thank you to those who
>>>> made
>>>>> the time to participate.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll finish up the rest of the release work tonight.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Devs,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tag: 1.5.2rc1
>>>>>> SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c
>>>>>> Staging Repository:
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Source tarball:
>>>>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5.
>>>>>> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Binary tarball:
>>>>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5.
>>>>>> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash
>> for a
>>>>>> given artifact.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signing keys available at:
>> https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved
>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=
>>>>>> blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb=
>>>>>> 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B
>>>>>> entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM
>>> ET,
>>>>>> 8/18 5:00PM PT)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Josh
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message