Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of josh.elser@gmail.com designates
 209.85.192.46 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <53E94203.8030005@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:21:55 -0400
From: Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC0
References: <53E2CF1C.3040006@gmail.com>
	<CADxc9BmQhdM+hHqioDL5AhR+URw+oE6UBJH1pmpxgCD7=xEU4g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGHyZ6KKjMu3mRzxAVjzQYxPevFWS2uFrXSFPpTM4X7Qf95mDw@mail.gmail.com>
	<53E67219.4080405@gmail.com>
	<CAGHyZ6JFU1Yrsn704Gm1cU7HPwuX0kJ5bQWDuNSAOH_nxOAEag@mail.gmail.com>
	<53E6809B.2030707@gmail.com>
 <CAL5zq9bBzw96nKjL9uMBLdLqZfANfqquUnNZNV7_JxdCUwFsMA@mail.gmail.com>
 <53E6877D.5090008@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <53E6877D.5090008@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Christopher saved the day -- https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-812

tl;dr >=git-1.8 was broken with <maven-release-plugin-2.5 (really, the 
underlying git maven-scm-provider)

On 8/9/14, 4:41 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> I actually had to manually edit all of the poms because the release
> plugin didn't change the version from a SNAPSHOT to a release for some
> reason. I have no idea why. `mvn release:prepare` wasn't doing what I
> expected it to.
>
> On 8/9/2014 4:31 PM, Christopher wrote:
>> Are you still manually editing the release properties file to prepare a
>> release candidate, in order to checkout the release tag for "mvn
>> release:perform"?
>> If so, you should add "<localCheckout>true</localCheckout>" to the
>> release
>> plugin config, so you don't have to do that. (Compare with master branch
>> pom.xml)
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes
>>>
>>>
>>> "Eric committed a little fix for ACCUMULO-2905 that isn't contained in
>>> rc0. I'll probably end up rolling an rc1 for that alone."
>>>
>>> On 8/9/2014 3:51 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
>>>
>>>> Since I haven't seen any actual votes yet, is it safe to assume
>>>> there will
>>>> be an RC1?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   2.4.0 as well, I believe (I know I put 2.4.1 somewhere, but I
>>>> don't think
>>>>> it was for this testing).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/9/2014 9:20 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   What versions of Hadoop have folks been testing with?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>