Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
From: "THORMAN, ROBERT D" <rt2357@att.com>
To: "dev@accumulo.apache.org" <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Search
Thread-Topic: Search
Thread-Index: 
 AQHPofBsjW+c1Zoy9EKo/+2sN9XY6puk9EuAgAABCgCAAc7bAIAHuC8AgAAZAICAAL1zgA==
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:26:47 +0000
Message-ID: <CFF681A6.EBC%rt2357@att.com>
References: <CFED85FD.CB9%rt2357@att.com> <53C81EA5.7010302@gmail.com>
 <211D3DDA-7209-48DD-BC6B-55F6A7D4158A@clearedgeit.com>
 <CALn26R==MSiQD+JNZ5mye+cbk-0vyY22nVzdT40p-6KMY5cigw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+zmODi_yr+5FwguqcOGjygzQjp8NnbV2yah-q7M0=eEHMosAQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOiJXP7czzoOTXo6D-N=Wn0CoyEC3oU+jd+JVMKC6CLbhBFPuA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOiJXP7czzoOTXo6D-N=Wn0CoyEC3oU+jd+JVMKC6CLbhBFPuA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <26F263BEDE26B34DA0B2A524DE3FA966@LOCAL>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

David,

How would you tie the two streams back together so that data is not
duplicated but referenced by SolrCloud into Accumulo?

v/r
Bob Thorman
Principal Big Data Engineer
AT&T Big Data CoE
2900 W. Plano Parkway
Plano, TX 75075
972-658-1714


On 7/23/14, 5:09 PM, "David Medinets" <david.medinets@gmail.com> wrote:

>Ingest to a queue. Have two processes subscribe to the queue. One
>pushing into Accumulo and the other pushing into SolrCloud. Why
>tightly couple the capabilities?
>
>On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Roshan Punnoose <roshanp@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> Is there a way to tie into the write process in Accumulo? Maybe just
>>use an
>> Iterator that worked on compaction to send data to blur/solr? I have
>>seen
>> something similar in Cassandra, a data hook to save data in Solr.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Nehal Mehta <nehal413@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> We were trying to do so, but adding visibility while adding/searching
>>> documents needs lot more thinking. Adding visibility to core search
>>>engine
>>> needs changes to algorithm and that does not make it very scalable.
>>> Integration besides granular visibility is very doable. and we had
>>>taken
>>> inspiration from Solandra.
>>>
>>> Obviously if we can get it done it adds lot of value. I believe Sqrrl
>>> people have already done it, are they thinking to open source it
>>>anytime in
>>> future?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Donald Miner <dminer@clearedgeit.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > We briefly toyed with blur on accumulo but didnt get too far just
>>>because
>>> > it was obe. I think that would be cool.
>>> >
>>> > > On Jul 17, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > It's definitely possible. I remember hearing about someone doing
>>>lucene
>>> > on top of Accumulo once, but I don't recall seeing a nice package
>>>with a
>>> > bow on top.
>>> > >
>>> > >> On 7/17/14, 2:53 PM, THORMAN, ROBERT D wrote:
>>> > >> What lexical search package (like lucene/solr) has anyone put on
>>>top
>>> of
>>> > accumulo?  Is this possible or does everyone just index log files and
>>> > documents?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> v/r
>>> > >> Bob Thorman
>>> > >> Principal Big Data Engineer
>>> > >> AT&T Big Data CoE
>>> > >> 2900 W. Plano Parkway
>>> > >> Plano, TX 75075
>>> > >> 972-658-1714
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>