Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of josh.elser@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.44 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <53ADC751.2070902@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:34:41 -0400
From: Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reduced testing burden for bug-fix releases
References: <53A33643.7000603@gmail.com>
 <CAGUtCHpabia65M12079w3a6VSfwe+Vd45Ard-0+wQDLx2jYdHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <53A33CC0.7090206@gmail.com> <53AC6D77.8070303@gmail.com>
 <53ADB04E.9010808@gmail.com>
 <CAGHyZ6JngSiRpEddg6a+_VUFQA3YGtTCANNi572uoig5zCRU=A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGHyZ6JngSiRpEddg6a+_VUFQA3YGtTCANNi572uoig5zCRU=A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

What did you have in mind? Please make a suggestion.

On 6/27/14, 2:28 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> as a follow up, can we agree on a label or add a flag to jiras that can be
> used to signal when we think a particular issue introduces changes that
> warrant the higher level of testing scrutiny?
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just pushed this to production. Thanks to those who gave their opinions.
>>
>>
>> On 6/26/14, 2:59 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
>>
>>> I've update the language on the release guidelines on the staged site[1]
>>> for what was discussed here.
>>>
>>> Please let me know if there are any problems with it, otherwise I'll
>>> push the changes to production later today. If you miss this message
>>> before I push to production, please feel free to continue the discussion
>>> and we can revise the language and make sure we're all happy.
>>>
>>> - Josh
>>>
>>> [1] http://accumulo.staging.apache.org/governance/releasing.html#testing
>>>
>>> On 6/19/14, 3:40 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/19/14, 12:36 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am in favor of lowering the required threshhold.  If someone feels not
>>>>> enough testing was done, they can vote -1 the release vote.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I like that. If there is a specific area/reason to be concerned, it can
>>>> be addressed as a part of the regular release voting process.
>>>>
>>>
>
>