Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75CEF10885 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16350 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2014 18:33:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 16302 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2014 18:33:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 16290 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2014 18:33:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:33:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of josh.elser@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.171] (HELO mail-qc0-f171.google.com) (209.85.216.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:33:45 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id w7so239263qcr.30 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:33:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GAoGPbLdO8gvVGakbm2IcH8LN+lKK03yH++O7pcQzOQ=; b=HbYur2Nad45yhXEq5zt4LaNYkA4z8R8lYGZs2+AQ6w94fKMv97QS/9sePAIo/DVD7q T1WtOD1cmXiMyNPGNFCOej7oMEmQhAuMYYYrpI4z1z4sAMYSRWU1AOZAbbZvyG1jHZmy DIhwG7uq+t2x5DOT7NfBh5Z5jWpHJ8+EIeFiUwpA83C7Q2c/HXVK7BZVpbw2UjIeWlXZ IXi5NpqGoIiqKHml6I2AlKJ+VoD28K1tLHg6yZZVemoxjGjztdXabkUuafYlr5QtgJIA 0k+l1mFriuk0E/8MpJbIqpXQcbMAoYWOI5tsYtsIoxzMy0w/lJeVSwZAocUCWNIdSFzo ZBfQ== X-Received: by 10.224.0.70 with SMTP id 6mr26000901qaa.100.1402511604957; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:33:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HW10447.local (pool-71-166-48-47.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [71.166.48.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v49sm16268042qgv.20.2014.06.11.11.33.24 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:33:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5398A0F7.2050805@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:33:27 -0400 From: Josh Elser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Subject: Re: Deploying SNAPSHOTs to nexus References: <53974FCF.6070800@gmail.com> <53989F2A.6040403@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53989F2A.6040403@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Finally found a job that does deploy SNAPSHOTs https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit I'm guessing that the way they're executing things source's some environment variable that has the sensitive bits to deploy. On 6/11/14, 2:25 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > On http://www.apache.org/dev/repository-faq.html > > They call out deploying a SNAPSHOT as long as the PMC is ok with it, but > they also mention Maven 1 which, I believe, is older than me. > > I don't think that deploying artifacts to the snapshots area of Nexus > equates to an official release, but that's my opinion and the lack of > any other docs that make me think otherwise (if we weren't allowed to > deploy snapshots, why would we even have that repository available to us). > > I looked at the Jenkins job briefly too. The job does have an option to > auto-deploy, but I'm not sure if the permissions would be implicitly > handled for us. I haven't found another project which appears to publish > snapshots on each build yet. > > On 6/11/14, 10:31 AM, Christopher wrote: >> I don't know for sure about what was done in the past, but we should >> consider the ASF policy about not making non releases generally available >> to non devs before we make this change. Can try to find link to policy >> later. >> Before we released 1.6.0, I got a request to upload some new >> 1.6.0-SNAPSHOT >> jars. After thinking about it some more, I convinced myself that we, >> at one >> point, had SNAPSHOTs being automatically deployed by Jenkins. >> >> Does anyone remember for sure? Was it lost in the svn->git transition? >> Any >> arguments against not trying to make this work again? >>