Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E38311D6A for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 23:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2805 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2014 23:44:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 2763 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2014 23:44:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 2726 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2014 23:44:00 -0000 Received: from reviews-vm.apache.org (HELO reviews.apache.org) (140.211.11.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 23:44:00 +0000 Received: from reviews.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by reviews.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C5E1DB0E0; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 23:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============6074816036930691124==" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Review Request 22537: HeapIterator optimization From: keith@deenlo.com To: "Jonathan Park" , "accumulo" , keith@deenlo.com Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 23:43:50 -0000 Message-ID: <20140618234350.13794.47089@reviews.apache.org> X-ReviewBoard-URL: https://reviews.apache.org Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Sender: noreply@reviews.apache.org X-ReviewGroup: accumulo X-ReviewRequest-URL: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22537/ X-Sender: noreply@reviews.apache.org References: <20140618231423.13794.18805@reviews.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <20140618231423.13794.18805@reviews.apache.org> Reply-To: keith@deenlo.com X-ReviewRequest-Repository: accumulo --===============6074816036930691124== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > On June 18, 2014, 11:14 p.m., kturner wrote: > > I took a look at the code. The changes look good. I am going to try running an end to end experiment like the one you ran w/ CI. However I am going to generate random rows with multiple columns. HeapIterator has no unit test itself, but its well covered by the MultiIteratorTest and RFileTest. I ran those two test w/ the patch and looked at code coverage, its almost 100%. The only things not covered were the cases where IllegalStateException was thrown. - kturner ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22537/#review46142 ----------------------------------------------------------- On June 12, 2014, 9:54 p.m., Jonathan Park wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/22537/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 12, 2014, 9:54 p.m.) > > > Review request for accumulo. > > > Bugs: ACCUMULO-2827 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2827 > > > Repository: accumulo > > > Description > ------- > > HeapIterator optimization to avoid always re-inserting back into the heap. > > > Diffs > ----- > > core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/iterators/system/HeapIterator.java e54f37c > core/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/iterators/system/BenchmarkMultiIterator.java PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22537/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > mvn clean install > > accumulo continuous ingest: saw ~5% improvement on uniformly distributed data. (see ticket for more details) > > > Thanks, > > Jonathan Park > > --===============6074816036930691124==--