accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Drob <mad...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: Using ZooCache in unit tests
Date Thu, 12 Jun 2014 00:21:01 GMT
I tried passing a MockInstance and a mock(Instance.class) higher in the
call chain, but it still tried to pull information out of them to make the
call.

Explicitly mocking that call might work, but I thought there was some issue
with PowerMock and Java 7 that existed when mocking static methods? Oh,
also that call is private, so I'd have to mock everything that uses it.
I'll look into that soon.


On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 8:16 PM, William Slacum <
wilhelm.von.cloud@accumulo.net> wrote:

> What about mocking that call?
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Mike Drob <madrob@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > When writing unit tests, I indirectly call code that invokes
> > {{Tables.getZooCache(Instance)}} which sets up a connection to a
> zookeeper.
> > However, there is not a server running, so this end up looping forever
> > until my test times out.
> >
> > It looks like my options are...
> > 1) Make it an IT that uses MAC, so that there is a ZK to connect to
> > (probably overkill)
> > 2) Stand up my own ZK (error prone? duplicative?)
> > 3) Stand up a Curator Testing Server (introduces new dependencies).
> > 4) Not write tests.
> >
> > I'm leaning toward number 3, but was wondering if anybody had thoughts on
> > this, since I feel like that will have a lasting impact on the code.
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message