Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA6DC1159B for ; Mon, 5 May 2014 19:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58190 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2014 19:01:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 58123 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2014 19:01:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 58112 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2014 19:01:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 May 2014 19:01:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [209.85.128.179] (HELO mail-ve0-f179.google.com) (209.85.128.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 May 2014 19:01:26 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f179.google.com with SMTP id oy12so6254988veb.38 for ; Mon, 05 May 2014 12:01:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=v1NNqsik3t1oztH8AIGuqIdSgq439GZWMGmNbH5Of28=; b=IGk+JWSvpiiPwPU9tmnUipKn+V5hk08KmViT6RH0/Xsp2SNqbp8NpujbA7HdP+B/BQ jgjw2o+U73IokHZ58G0KufkljNclMseLG2ySyciD5s9TAvCvcGH2PUB+8uDLQZ4IxNHx 4MzS2VWMfqm0ICcagNS1TXnnZ3L4+KTVzUJ9AnfTaUnaf41t5BHYknt8XocxNptuHgJy /F6SZ2jyk5aD7NZ0w9PqbfkuVnK1QEiTNu6rk71N4TglUv8XuFujWzN+BB2dQGb8uCg1 2gZLUnNilFn0Rm65chZXxhTvXxvtVGKGQMFf0SMM+xiRTfKpVkEjsHAahpB9TcoBH5rx h6eQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnmg2dAtAr5ROwICfbjL3a7h4MuwSBOOITyXwi4i5OV8zgpo+3cTy7remUnb4oUUknY0RZ2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.3.168 with SMTP id d8mr1080264vdd.79.1399316463618; Mon, 05 May 2014 12:01:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.221.21.199 with HTTP; Mon, 5 May 2014 12:01:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 15:01:03 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] end of life plan for 1.4 branch From: Keith Turner To: Accumulo Dev List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b397dd5dbbe670f04f8abc095 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --485b397dd5dbbe670f04f8abc095 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 -1 I am opposed to the tag, because I think what it communicates to users is confusing. I'm in favor of what Christopher suggested. I was undecided about the general concept of 1.4 EOL, I am still working w/ some users who are still using 1.4 in the short term. Should they run into a serious bug, we will very likely fix it. I discussed this situation w/ Christopher and he suggested if this situation were to occur we could simply post a patch jira. That plan sounds good w/ me and makes me comfortable w/ 1.4 EOL now. On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > Accumulo Folks, > > I would like to declare end of life for the 1.4 branch of development. It's > been active for a little over two years and the release of 1.6.0 means we > now have three active releases. > > Declaring end of life would mean > > * Posting an ANNOUNCE message to the user list > * No longer accepting issue fix version targets for future 1.4 releases > * Removing fix version targets of 1.4.x for existing open issues > * The end of having a long lived 1.4 related branch in git > * Removing direct references to 1.4.x releases on our download page > * No longer linking to the 1.4 related documentation from the main > navigation area > > Our issue tracker shows that candidate version 1.4.6 currently has: > > * 9 closed issues, none of which are blockers or critical. > * 1 issue in patch available status, marked critical > * 18 open issues with a target fix version of 1.4.6, four of which are > marked critical. > > Because there is existing work, but not yet enough to warrant a release, I > propose > that on successful passing of this vote we create a "1.4.6-eol" tag with > the then > current state of the development branch. > > Please vote > > [ ] +1 I am in favor of announcing End of Life according to the above plan > [ ] +-0 I am indifferent > [ ] -1 I am opposed to the above End of Life plan because... > > I'm treating this like a release vote. Thus, it will be handled with > Majority Approval: > to pass it will need 3 committers to +1 and more committers voting +1 than > -1. > > Vote will remain open for 72 hours, until Tuesday, May 6 2014, 20:40 UTC > > -- > Sean > --485b397dd5dbbe670f04f8abc095--